RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-27 Thread Robert Meyer
+1 Thanks, Robert Meyer Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:12:30 +0100 From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk I tested the code with some examples from a weekly newsletter that I

RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-27 Thread Simon Steiner
Hi, Thanks all for voting. The vote has now concluded and has passed with 5 +1 votes. Thanks From: Robert Meyer [mailto:rme...@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: 27 June 2014 09:52 To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk +1 Thanks, Robert Meyer

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-26 Thread Luis Bernardo
I tested the code with some examples from a weekly newsletter that I receive -- this is a good example because the newsletter is always created using the same template and the same set of fonts (with a few exceptions). The code worked mostly well but the output was not perfect with some of

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-23 Thread Chris Bowditch
Hi Simon, This branch represents many months of hard work. Merging fonts within separate PDFs is far from a trivial task, and has been requested by almost everyone who uses the PDF Plug-in. Thanks you and well done on bringing the implementation to this point. I downloaded the branch and

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-23 Thread Clay Leeds
Will there be 'one last release using Java 5’ enabling the most widespread use of the latest FOP development or does this mean that the last version of Java 5 support will be FOP 1.1? Either way, I think this is a great improvement! Great work, Simon! +1 from me. On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:11 AM,