Hi, sorry for a bit late reply,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 23.09.2006 23:12:06 Tomáa Studva wrote:
Hi developers,
We are using FOP as rendering engine for FO in wysiwyg xml editor
http://sourceforge.net/projects/euromath2. When opening about 40 page fo
document, the editation is ugly slow. We
On 27.09.2006 13:41:01 Tomas Studva wrote:
snip/
Yes, I know the design goals of FOP are
* Conformance to the XSL-FO Specification
* Process Files of Arbitrary Size
* Minimize Memory Use
and to use it in WYSIWYG editor is extend of FOP project scope.
Co-developer of
Hi Simon,
Simon Pepping wrote:
This is a very interesting and ambitious project.
Yes, ambitious and hard enough, but much of work is done, now we are
concerning on rendering engines, first to design rendering
framework/engine and afterwards on implementation for popular document
types.
I
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 27.09.2006 13:41:01 Tomas Studva wrote:
snip/
Yes, I know the design goals of FOP are
* Conformance to the XSL-FO Specification
* Process Files of Arbitrary Size
* Minimize Memory Use
and to use it in WYSIWYG editor is extend of FOP project scope.
This is a very interesting and ambitious project. I would like to see
such a project succeed. But WYSIWYG editing is very hard to
achieve. That was (and is) the case with TeX, where it was tried, and
it is the case with FOP. As Jeremias already answered, FOP is not
close to such a goal. We would
On 23.09.2006 23:12:06 Tomá Studva wrote:
Hi developers,
We are using FOP as rendering engine for FO in wysiwyg xml editor
http://sourceforge.net/projects/euromath2. When opening about 40 page fo
document, the editation is ugly slow. We can track changes in source
document(also in case
Hi developers,
We are using FOP as rendering engine for FO in
wysiwyg xml editor http://sourceforge.net/projects/euromath2.
When opening about 40 page fo document, the editation is ugly slow. We can
track changes in source document(also in case using XSLT), but there is a principal
