Re: FOs and Areas

As an active FOP user I have been monitoring the fop-dev list for the last 2 years or so. The recent discussion between Victor and Peter and JÃrg's comment below seem to highlight a difference in opinion where the project is headed. Based on the various discussions on this list and the web site i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25272] - FNF thrown formatting test/resources/fop/image/align.fo

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Constants.java

[Glen Mazza] It's been in that location for at least several months--it's just that we never saw it because it was autogenerated and never checked into CVS. (As for its location--it is used by the FO classes and it also has some FO constants and other enumerations in there, so it is OK remaining

RE: FOs and Areas

Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > With all due respect, I think you're overreacting here. Maybe you already > know this yourself, and have changed your mind about the > 'adios'... Anyway, > I have been following the discussions between Peter and yourself > (--at least > the recent ones, which may be ex

RE: FOs and Areas

> -Original Message- > From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > > > However, right now, reacting the way you do, I'm getting the impression > > you're taking it waaay *too* seriously --in fact, you have been > doing that > > all along. It almost seems

RE: FOs and Areas

> -Original Message- > From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: > > > The gist of this section seems to be ... that you don't know enough to > comment on what is going on. Duly noted. > Not quite. More like: I *think* I don't know enough (maybe _that_ is

RE: Going away (was: FOs and Areas)

Jeremias Maerki wrote: > On 17.12.2003 15:25:37 Victor Mote wrote: > > I would rather go away than to be the guy that everyone wishes would > > go away. > > Ok, Victor, until that happens I'd like you to stay. I don't see *any* > indication that *anyone* wishes that *anybody* should go away. Well,

Re: FOs and Areas

Andreas L. Delmelle wrote: Which is done by {which parser?} Xerces 2.3.4, but it doesn't matter. The problem are the generated Java objects. 80k? For how many fo:* approx. in the file? 8 objects. A table with some twenty odd columns and 800+ rows. A TableCell, a Block and a FOText per cell. The

Re: FOs and Areas

J.Pietschmann wrote: Peter B. West wrote: (does JÃrg work?), Not in the archive. I know you are a long-time advocate of sticking with the codebase, and have been very critical of my approach, so I don't want to draw any unwarranted conclusions here. Does the above mean that you are interested

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Constants.java

gmazza 2003/12/18 15:37:45 Added: src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/properties Constants.java Removed: src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Constants.java Log: Place Constants.java file in wrong location. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/f

cvs commit: xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs book.xml team.xml

gmazza 2003/12/18 17:08:42 Modified:src/documentation/content/xdocs book.xml team.xml Log: Updates to team page. Revision ChangesPath 1.28 +2 -2 xml-fop/src/documentation/content/xdocs/book.xml Index: book.xml

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Constants.java

--- Finn Bock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Peter was refering to the fact that you > placed the file in the > src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/ > directory, but it used to be in the > org.apache.fop.fo.properties. > package. Indeed, the package statement in the > Constants still reads >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25272] - [PATCH] FNF thrown formatting test/resources/fop/image/align.fo

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: xml-fop/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo Constants.java

Glen Mazza wrote: There's about 10-15 differences between Alt-Design and HEAD (my unresearched guess), and getting us on to INT constants--the no-brainer--removes one of them. Peter hopefully will start to see more of the "theory" of Alt-Design in HEAD, if not exactly the same implementation (e.g.