Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
snip/
Hi fellas,
Well... (sigh)... well ('nutha sigh)
What *does* Finn think, in that case? So far, I've yet to hear a single
*solid* argument pleading against the proposed change. Of course, something
like LM Makers can be added later on --the proposed AreaFactory
Finn Bock wrote:
I got some minor suggestions to the patch:
- It should be strict typed: createBlock(..), createInline(..)
- It should be complete so that all area creation was done through the
factory, not just the 3 areas that Tibor needs.
Yes.
Victor Mote
-Original Message-
From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Would anyone expect that Defoe would
subclass SAXException for document validation errors? If not (it
doesn't), why not?
Yes, if you use a SAX parser, why not? My point is that at the top-level, no
SAXExceptions
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project xml-fop has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects 1
Glen Mazza wrote:
I've bought it due to my work with the apps package and
removing AddLMVisitor, and how reducing the complexity
allowed many other changes in other areas that weren't
previously apparent to occur. I also think that many of your
later enhancements in properties wouldn't
-Original Message-
From: Victor Mote [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Victor,
I know better than to take this bait, but ...
No matter... +1 for starters
It has already been pointed out that, if the Visitor stuff was so
terribly complex, there were other solutions that could be
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Not only that. The use-case he described doesn't seem at all
far-fetched.
Imagine FOP/FOray/Defoe having an AWT renderer that displays
an editable XSL-FO in one window, the rendered result in the
other, and allows for updates/modifications made in the first
to
--- Andreas L. Delmelle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
To be completely honest, I was a bit disappointed
when after a couple of
months absence, finally able to check out the
sources again, I had to find
that the whole Visitor design just got kicked out
Andreas, we thoroughly discussed the issue
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disagree with you that FOP should have ceased all
development during the four or five months you were
off the list. Open-source doesn't work that way.
Hmmm... One question:
Are you so bent on misinterpreting one's
Andreas L. Delmelle schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: Glen Mazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I disagree with you that FOP should have ceased all
development during the four or five months you were
off the list. Open-source doesn't work that way.
Hmmm... One question:
Are you so
Luca,
Running our embedded.fo example in both FOP 0.20.5 and FOP 1.0 is
showing a centering problem for the Embedding SVG title located at the
top of the document (this text is located in the fo:block at line 31 of
the .fo document.)
The title centers correctly in 0.20.5, but is left-justified
[Glen]
Finn, keep in mind--both you and Simon wanted
pluggable LM's, and you even supplied a patch for it a
few months ago. But you have been mostly silent on
the matter ever since (i.e., it looks like you don't
have a need for it ATM.)
Or perhaps I've been working on other things, like
12 matches
Mail list logo
