RE: source for hz algorithm

n the formatting object tree. Since different people have different speed-quality priorities, the design allows choices for layout rules (once the choices are written, however). Regards, Tony Graham XML Technolog

Re: [Fwd: [xsl] Sun xmlroff XSL Formatter as SourceForge Project]

f. If you are interested in xmlroff, see the SourceForge sites. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center - Dublin Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business

RE: markers in redesign

then it becomes anarchy. It seems like user I wasn't there when the spec was written, but it seems to me that 'currently-formatted page' presupposes making pages on the fly and doesn't quite describe pages that are unbounded in one or both directions (i.e. where there

Re: markers in redesign

that follows in the area tree any other similarly constrained area that is attached to an identically named fo:marker, using pre-order traversal order. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center - Dubli

unicode-bidi and FOP 2.0?

of FOP 2.0? Regards, Tony Graham Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3

unicode-bidi in FOP 2.0?

of FOP 2.0? Regards, Tony Graham Tony Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3

Re: Tasks - layout

pt. I just looked in the XSL Recommendation, and Section 7.8.1 notes: XSL uses an abstract model of a font. This model is described in this section and is based on current font technology as exemplified by the OpenType specification [OpenType]. Maybe you also need to look at the OpenType

RE:

Arved Sandstrom wrote at 26 Sep 2002 19:50:01 -0300: > Tony Graham says that should be a Unicode character, or Char. As > in the actual real, encoded thing. Empirical evidence suggests that is the general understanding: grepping the XSL CR test suite shows everybody, FOP included,

Re:

Peter B. West wrote at 28 Sep 2002 00:39:34 +1000: ... > Tony Graham wrote: ... > > Section 5.11, Property Datatypes, trumps the individual property > > definitions, since Section 5.11 defines "the syntax for specifying the > > datatypes usable in property values&qu

Re:

er's code point, although the hexadecimal representation is usually preferable. In XSL terms, "'1'" is a one-character string literal, but while you could claim that it is one character, there's no XSL conversion from a string to a character, so shoul

Re:

Peter B. West wrote at 30 Sep 2002 13:28:18 +1000: > Tony Graham wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 27 Sep 2002 16:44:32 -0300: ... > > > That means "-", "#12235" , etc are characters, while "'1'" is not. > > &

Sun XSL Formatter

. The formatter is awaiting final approval before the code can be made public source. An announcement will be made on xsl-list, www-xsl-fo, and XSL-FO@YahooGroups once the code is available. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center Sun Microsystems Ireland

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

le when he announced his SourceForge project, so wind taking runs both ways. I would be pleased if Arved and/or Eric would consider assisting with the project. Frankly, I would be pleased if *anybody* assisted with the project, but Arved and Eric would be a bonus. Regards, Tony Graham -

RE: Sun XSL Formatter

words, it > could be a failed internal project to create a commercial product. No. Regards, Tony Graham XML Technology Center - Dublin Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708 Hami