/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
[PATCH] Performance tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
[PATCH] Performance tuning
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-11-25 10:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=3944)
Correction for BorderAndPadding wrong color
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
[PATCH] Performance tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
[PATCH] Performance tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Performance tuning
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-30 07:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=3658)
performanceTuning.patch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Performance tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http://nohardcore.tripod.com|
|/fop/performanceTuning.zip
On Thu, 2002-10-24 at 21:17, Victor Mote wrote:
By mimicking the URL on the Cocoon web site, I have created a URL to show
the [PATCH] Queue for FOP, and it is in the attached one-line text file.
I'll try to get it into the doc web site stuff after the, er, patch queue
gets flushed out. This
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Performance tuning
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|http:// |http://nohardcore.tripod.com
Hi, I have posted a patch in to the bugzilla (14013).
It makes the fop_0.20.4 run aboute 20-30% faster.
But if you think its not fast enough(i dont), i have som ideers how its possible to tweak the fop to preform real good.
/Henrik
performanceTuning.zip
Description: Zip archive
/show_bug.cgi?id=14013
Performance tuning
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-28 12:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=3627)
Performans tuning fop-0.20.4
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
: Performance tuning.
Hi,
What is the current status of this performance tuning.
Have the code changes been submitted and performance benefits
verified. I really could use some speed improvements with fop,
I have some very large reports 400/500 pages that are taking
5+ minutes to run.
Thanks,
Venu Reddy
Venu Reddy wrote:
What is the current status of this performance tuning.
By mimicking the URL on the Cocoon web site, I have created a URL to show
the [PATCH] Queue for FOP, and it is in the attached one-line text file.
I'll try to get it into the doc web site stuff after the, er, patch queue
Hello dear Venu,
Am Donnerstag, 24. Oktober 2002 20:28 schrieb Venu Reddy:
Hi,
What is the current status of this performance tuning.
Have the code changes been submitted and performance benefits
verified. I really could use some speed improvements with fop,
I have some very large reports
Hi,
What is the current status of this performance tuning.
Have the code changes been submitted and performance benefits
verified. I really could use some speed improvements with fop,
I have some very large reports 400/500 pages that are taking
5+ minutes to run.
Thanks,
Venu Reddy
P.S: I am
Henrik Olsson wrote:
Hi.
I have runned several performance tests on the FOP and and I have found
out several bottle necks (especially in the PropertyListBuilder).
Most things is about reducing gc and some others about not so well written
code.
The result of this tunings gives me a speed of 3
Hi Henrik
I have started the task to create diffs.
Great.
But it makes it a bit complecated since there are about 10 diffrent things
i have done to the code and some things affects more then 20 source files.
So the question are: Do You want all the changes in one bunch or them
diffrent groups that belongs together?
Henrik
Jeremias Maerki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2002-10-17 10:56
Please respond to fop-dev
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Performance tuning.
Henrik,
that sounds very interesting. Normal procedures for sending changes
Hi.
I have runned several performance tests on the FOP and and I have found
out several bottle necks (especially in the PropertyListBuilder).
Most things is about reducing gc and some others about not so well written
code.
The result of this tunings gives me a speed of 3 time faster than the
]
Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 10:30
AM
Subject: Performance tuning.
Hi.I have runned several performance
tests on the FOP and and I have foundout several bottle necks (especially
in the PropertyListBuilder).Most things is about reducing gc and some
others about not so well
Henrik,
that sounds very interesting. Normal procedures for sending changes is
to create a unified CVS diff file. You'll find some instructions
following the URL below:
http://xml.apache.org/source.html
It's best if you post the two diff files (against the maintenance branch
and the main
20 matches
Mail list logo