Hi Peter,
>. . .
> The feasibility of an XSLT transform would
> be greatly influenced by the complexity of the mappings of properties
> into RTF structures.
Yes, and in order to support the various "flavors" of RTF one has to take
into account a number of (mostly dirty) tricks, which is proba
Bertrand,
Thanks for clarifying that. The feasibility of an XSLT transform would
be greatly influenced by the complexity of the mappings of properties
into RTF structures. If the inheritance model of XSLFO had no ready
parallel in RTF, that set of transformations would be a nightmare, I
ima
Hi Peter,
> I tentatively suggested using XSLT to generate RTF a little while ago,
> but I had no idea whether it was feasible. The main question would seem
> to be: is RTF a text-only format or a binary format? Can anyone answer
> that one for us?
AFAIK, everything in RTF can be expressed wit
Peter B. West wrote:
> I tentatively suggested using XSLT to generate RTF a little while ago,
> but I had no idea whether it was feasible. The main question would seem
> to be: is RTF a text-only format or a binary format? Can anyone answer
> that one for us?
I believe it's feasible, I even
Peter B. West wrote:
<- Start ->
I tentatively suggested using XSLT to generate RTF a little while ago, but I
had no idea whether it was feasible. The main question would seem to be: is
RTF a text-only format or a binary format? Can anyone answer that one for
us?
<- End ->
I am
Hansuli,
I tentatively suggested using XSLT to generate RTF a little while ago,
but I had no idea whether it was feasible. The main question would seem
to be: is RTF a text-only format or a binary format? Can anyone answer
that one for us?
Peter
J.U. Anderegg wrote:
> Document formats can
