--- Thomas DeWeese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A combined user-list might be a good starter...
>
> I think a combined user-list would be a
> disaster. In general I
> think the people who need to know about SVG get told
> about Batik and
> the people who need to know about XSL-FO get told
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas DeWeese [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> I think a combined user-list would be a disaster. In general I
> think the people who need to know about SVG get told about Batik and
> the people who need to know about XSL-FO get told about FOP if they
> w
Hi Andreas, Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Concerning the proposed TLPs I'm wondering if FOP and Batik shouldn't go
together somehow. Both projects deal with XML to graphics conversions.
FOP currently has 2 Batik Transcoder implementations (additional output
formats for Bati
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi,
Not being subscribed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I'm posting on fop-dev for the time
being (besides this, I'm a bit hesitant on whether I should even b
(I'm CCing batik-dev and fop-dev once to invite everyone to discuss this
on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please repond on general only and do not cross-post
unneccessarily.)
Concerning the proposed TLPs I'm wondering if FOP and Batik shouldn't go
together somehow. Both projects deal with XML to graphics conv
