RE: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-08-01 Thread Rhett Aultman
art building a "rule tree generator" for the classloader to use. -Original Message- From: Keiron Liddle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 11:50 AM To: FOP Subject: RE: FOP Specialized Classloader Hi, If I remember correctly (and read the right archive mess

Re: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-07-22 Thread Jeremias Maerki
You're probably right. So go for it. And thanks, anyway, for helping to improve FOP! > My primary concern with utilizing different source build paths is that it will >require everyone to build from source. I think this could hamper FOP's acceptance, >which is the main reason I didn't support t

RE: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-07-22 Thread Rhett Aultman
-Original Message- From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon 7/22/2002 2:24 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: FOP Specialized Classloader Rhett, I'v

RE: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-07-22 Thread Keiron Liddle
Hi, If I remember correctly (and read the right archive messages) the original trigger was the jdk1.3 specific code for AWT fonts. Suggesting the need to handle jdk version specific issues. There are a number of potential issues. For jdk1.4 I recently discovered they have image IO classes that us

Re: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-07-21 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Rhett, I've read through your proposal and I end up being -0. Here are some pros and cons that came to my mind (disclaimer: no scientific research behind those points): + Works around certain problems in an elegant fashion. We can provide the best code for each JDK-version. + Interested partie

RE: FOP Specialized Classloader

2002-07-16 Thread Rhett Aultman
er B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 9:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help #10379 Rhett, The way it seems to work is that the bug remains assigned to fop-dev, and anyone who want to add comments or attachments ca

Re: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help #10379

2002-07-01 Thread Peter B. West
Rhett, The way it seems to work is that the bug remains assigned to fop-dev, and anyone who want to add comments or attachments can go ahead. Consider it assigned to you. Keep the list in touch with what you are doing; think aloud about design issues and ask any specific questions as they ar

RE: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help (Was:RE: Fop andJDK1.2)

2002-07-01 Thread Rhett Aultman
2 10:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help (Was:RE: Fop andJDK1.2) Rhett, Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you on this one. In order that this not slip completely through the cracks, please put a request for enhancement (RFE) in Bugz

Re: FOP Specialized Classloader: Request for Help (Was:RE: Fop andJDK1.2)

2002-06-30 Thread Peter B. West
Rhett, Sorry it has taken me so long to get back to you on this one. In order that this not slip completely through the cracks, please put a request for enhancement (RFE) in Bugzilla. You can pretty much copy your comments from this message into the RFE. If you have had any further thought