On 25 Jul 2001 16:44:47 +1000, Darren Munt wrote:
As an interim measure, we decided to produce the FO file separately
with another parser (I wont tell you which one, it will only make you
cross)
We'll make wild guesses and get cross anyway. You are using MSXML,
right? :) [No need to
I've noticed a bit of chat on the list the last few days concerning
performance. I'm having a few problems in that area and I wondered if anyone
had any suggestions. I have a 16 page document, consisting of text and
embedded images, which is presently taking 30 seconds to generate. I've
At 07:27 PM 7/24/01 +1000, Darren Munt wrote:
I'm aware that it is possible to compile java classes as COM components, but
even if I knew where to start on this, I'm not sure it would help much. The
cocoon approach was looking good for us, but we discovered that the version
of FOP that is
My confidence level of being able to transition FOP to COM myself is very
low. It would be really nice if someone would take this on :) Or maybe I'm
just being lazy.
You said earlier that Cocoon worked for you but you dropped it because
it used an older version of FOP. Did you look at
