les. This would make
sure that everybody builds upon the same basis. It would make the samples
more easily comparable.
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:20 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
On Tuesday 18 December 2001 09:59, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> Right now, I have a pice of code I would contribute. It would be useful, if
> there were an alternative e-mail address to that of the list, to collect
> the submitted code segments.
ok, right now we don't have an alternative address av
.
Matthias Fischer
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
[...]
In the meantime, I'd encourage users that f
Thank you, Bertrand.
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 9:49 AM
To: Matthias Fischer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
[...]
In the meantime, I'd encourage
On Monday 17 December 2001 09:07, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> What are _your_ plans with regard to the material offered by W3C/Carmelo?
As mentioned by Keiron (see http://xml.apache.org/fop/testing.html), the
current FOP tests are based on automatically comparing the ouput
of two FOP revisions.
T
t;
> These questions are what comes to my mind after heaving visited the site.
>
> Matthias
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Carmelo Montanez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
er 14, 2001 8:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Matthias Fischer
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
Hi all:
Regarding the FO test suite. We at NIST in conjunction with the W3C
Developed
a test suite for FO. The site is:
www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite
Hi all:
Regarding the FO test suite. We at NIST in conjunction with the W3C
Developed
a test suite for FO. The site is:
www.w3.org/Style/XSL/TestSuite/
We are also working on expanding that work to include ALL of the basic
aspects of the language. We expect to have close to 5000 tests by
On Friday 14 December 2001 10:05, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> However, you won't escape "big maintenance" so easily:
Right - maintaining such a test suite is not light work.
The advantage over pure documentation, however, is that both users and
developers directly benefit from having strong test
an't do it all by himself ;-)
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects (big fat list vs. live test documents)
On Thursday 13 December 2001 15:35, Matthi
On Thursday 13 December 2001 15:35, Matthias Fischer wrote:
> . . .
> My whish to Santa Clause this year: A big fat list containing all major
> graphic formats and the FO/FOP-related aspects that concern them.
> . . .
I'm skeptical: to me "big fat list" means "big maintenance work" and usually
--- "Sander, Stefan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There already IS a user mailing list:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
It isn't listed on the page
http://xml.apache.org/mail.html
Perhaps someone with commit permission to the site cvs could change that.
Alex McLintock
=
Alex McLintock
Title: RE: Basic aspects
There already IS a user mailing list:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2001 16:21
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
Perhaps it would be useful to set
12/13/01 07:50 AM
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
I presume that was a frustrated email :)
One point I have to make:
You say that you have gone through all the problems and eventually sorted
them out after working through it
I presume that was a frustrated email :)
One point I have to make:
You say that you have gone through all the problems and eventually sorted
them out after working through it etc.
Yet after solving the problem you did not write to the list and say (to my
knowledge): I have worked out how to s
rue? Yes, they can.
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Arved Sandstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 2:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Basic aspects
[...]
When you say "documentation", I take
If I can specifically address one point, it is that I am curious about why
you think FOP is web-oriented at all.
If FOP is invoked from a servlet, which seems to be a popular mechanism,
then the output is indeed being delivered to Web browsers. Unless things are
different in Cocoon 2, Cocoon itse
18 matches
Mail list logo