On Nov 7, 2004, at 6:46 AM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
On a related note, IIRC I wanted to change the color scheme to Red -
Amber - Green (stop light analogy: No - Partial - Full compliance--I'm
aware of the argument about something either being compliant or it's
not ;-))
That's fine --
On Nov 5, 2004, at 6:41 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
Well, it didn't happen next week or even the week after. Getting
the FOP Standards Compliance page[1] up to snuff has been, shall we
say... challenging. But I've finally got content (the table of
'compliance'!) displaying.
On Oct 16, 2004, at 12:03 PM, Clay Leeds wrote:
My intention is to bring xml-fop up-to-date next week (I'll be out of
town this weekend).
Well, it didn't happen next week or even the week after. Getting the
FOP Standards Compliance page[1] up to snuff has been, shall we say...
challenging. But
Clay Leeds wrote:
Well, it didn't happen next week or even the week after. Getting the
FOP Standards Compliance page[1] up to snuff has been, shall we say...
challenging. But I've finally got content (the table of 'compliance'!)
displaying.
Unfortunately, we're still not there, as the link
Nice job, Clay--I'm very happy with the whole site PDF in particular.
Jeremias, would you please request write access for Clay now?
Thanks,
Glen
Clay Leeds wrote:
I thought you'd like to see a brief update on the FOP web site trials
and tribulations. I've uploaded the web portion of the output
