On 7/1/2003 2:06 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
Running the print renderer in a headless environment works
the same way as running Batik, given the printer is installed
correctly (not quite trivial). This and any additional ideas
like creating PostScript and piping it to lp should be added
to a sort of u
Clay Leeds wrote:
As for using '-print' headless,
some of my clients have attempted to use such a set up. IIRC, we set
them up to output to '-ps' and then piped that to the 'lp'. Should we
add this "workaround" to the FAQ, or is outputting to '-ps' an option
when SVG is one of the inputs?
Runni
On 7/1/2003 12:35 PM, J.Pietschmann wrote:
This is silly, nobody will start the AWT renderer on a headless
workstation. If you login via a text console and expect a window
to pop up, you have already missed something important.
Well, using the print renderer on a headless station, that's another
th
Clay Leeds wrote:
Unless I'm reading this wrong, this means the "headless" problem is
directly related to AWT, and because Batik "uses AWT classes for
rendering SVG" it is also indirectly affected. Am I correct? If so,
should the "headless" FAQ really be in an AWT section, and the Batik
section
On 7/1/2003 9:10 AM, Arnd Beißner wrote:
If so, should the "headless" FAQ really be in
an AWT section, and the Batik section provide
a reference to the AWT headless issue, rather
than the current way it's shown?
That's debatable, I think, and depends on whether
you put on a user's hat or a technica
Clay Leeds wrote:
> Unless I'm reading this wrong, this means the
> "headless" problem is directly related to AWT,
> and because Batik "uses AWT classes for rendering SVG"
> it is also indirectly affected. Am I correct?
Yes. Exactly.
> If so, should the "headless" FAQ really be in
> an AWT secti
On 01.07.2003 17:50:24 Clay Leeds wrote:
> On 7/1/2003 8:22 AM, Clay Leeds wrote:
> > This is just a guess, but perhaps you're running FOP headless (there's
> > no monitor?). This FAQ might provide a workaround:
> >
> > http://xml.apache.org/fop/graphics.html#batik
>
> I have a question or two
