Hello Arved,
> Those stylesheets are definitely worth using, but they are immature, not
> even close to being as ready as the DocBook HTML stylesheets. If
> you use a
> formatter other than FOP you will soon find out which DocBook constructs
> lead to problematic FO (that is, it's not FOP's fault
At 11:26 AM 7/26/01 +0100, Alex McLintock wrote:
> --- Sacha Labourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello,
>>
>> We have a set of documentations for the JBoss J2EE application server
>> Project (http://www.jboss.org/) that is written in XML DocBook and than
>> transformed in FO through well known
Hello Alex,
> I am contracted to a company in London which is using FOP and
> JBoss in the same department
> (but on different projects)
>
> I can possibly arrange to spend some time helping out with JBoss
> Docs -> XSL:FO -> PDF
> or preferably arrange to have an intern work on it.
Yes, sure,
--- Sacha Labourey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello,
>
> We have a set of documentations for the JBoss J2EE application server
> Project (http://www.jboss.org/) that is written in XML DocBook and than
> transformed in FO through well known XSL scripts.
Sascha,
I am contracted to a company i
