Chris Bowditch wrote:
> It would be a loss. If you could spare time to test the trunk, you could
> report back on which bits of layout need attention. A sort of gap
> analysis
> for basic FO documents would be really useful. This in turn would help
> encourage development of the layout.
>
> I have
From: Clay Leeds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It may not be too much of a loss, but I won't be able to test the trunk
until either a CLI is implemented, or I learn to run Java applets...
It would be a loss. If you could spare time to test the trunk, you could
report back on which bits of layout need a
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Until recently, the command-line interface of the trunk was basically
ignored due to other priorities. Configuration certainly has changed a
bit, but is obviously unfinished (Gradual move to Avalon Configuration,
inrtoduction of the Confihurable interface, work in progress).
Until recently, the command-line interface of the trunk was basically
ignored due to other priorities. Configuration certainly has changed a
bit, but is obviously unfinished (Gradual move to Avalon Configuration,
inrtoduction of the Confihurable interface, work in progress). IMO it's
low priority t
