Max Berger wrote:
Hi Max,
Many of these could be automatically solved using the eclipse "cleanup"
tools (which can actually be called on the whole src dir!). However,
that would result in a change in almost every file, and making merging
of separate branches almost impossible. This shoul
Hi,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> I'm scared by the thought of having a program "clean" our source code
> changing lots of files. I prefer the approach that the devs shall try to
> improve the code while they are working on it.
Agreed. Even if that doesn’t prevent us from scheduling a big “code
cleanu
Ok i am using fop-0.20.5 and all I am trying to do is get a jpeg images and
send it to a postscript printer, i think this did work at some point but it
is difficult to tell with so many releases. So the code looks something
like this:
PrinterID printerID = getPrinterID();
Process process
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent,
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
>> 18000 PMD violations is just sick. Things like rule [1] doesn't really help
>> the source code. We can do that if we get a budget for
>> nuclear-power-plant-grade
>> software.
> Same here I guess. Now may be the
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 01:18 PM
>
>>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>>Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 12:17 PM
>>
>
>>
>>FOP lacks of robustness h
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Max Berger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 01:11 PM
>
>> +1
>> I must say, I’ve never really grasped the benefit of doing this. I’d be
>> happy to be enlightened, though.
>
>Sure:
>
>Declaring a parameter / variable as final mak
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 03:56 PM
> In this case, all it takes is one look at the property definition (*) to find
> out
> that the behavior is only defined for fo:table-cell and fo:table-column.
forg
Oh by the way i am using Java 1.4.2.8 if that makes a diff or not.
Surj wrote:
>
> Ok i am using fop-0.20.5 and all I am trying to do is get a jpeg images
> and send it to a postscript printer, i think this did work at some point
> but it is difficult to tell with so many releases. So the c
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Surj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 05:07 PM
>
>Oh by the way i am using Java 1.4.2.8 if that makes a diff or not.
>
>Surj wrote:
>>
>> Ok i am using fop-0.20.5 and all I am trying to do is get a jpeg images
>> and send it to a
Andreas Delmelle wrote:
In the meantime, I made this change locally, but stumbled on the fact that we
do not have an event defined for non-applicable properties.
Now I'm wondering whether we should warn about those at all. According to the
XSL-FO Recommendation, any property may be specifie
Hi,
Thanks for your explanation.
Max Berger wrote:
>>> [1]
>>> http://pmd.sourceforge.net/rules/optimizations.html#MethodArgumentCouldBeFinal
>
>> +1
>> I must say, I’ve never really grasped the benefit of doing this. I’d be
>> happy to be enlightened, though.
>
> Sure:
>
> Declaring a parame
Chris, Andreas,
You’re both right of course. I didn’t have that possibility in mind when
writing my post to fop-dev. No warning needed indeed :-)
> Andreas Delmelle wrote:
>> The only modification would be:
>> * surrounding the method body of
>> ColumnNumberPropertyMaker.make(PropertyList, Stri
Yes the 'java.awt.headless=true' specified as a parameter when starting up
the weblogic container, is there any other way of setting this i.e.
programmatically during startup.
Thanks
Andreas Delmelle-2 wrote:
>
>>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>>Van: Surj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Verz
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 08:31 PM
>FWIW, I do re-assign local variables sometimes (rarely). When the new
>value serves the same purpose, and creating a new variable with another
>name would actually loo
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Surj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 09:23 PM
>
>Yes the 'java.awt.headless=true' specified as a parameter when starting up
>the weblogic container, is there any other way of setting this i.e.
>programmatically during startup.
>- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
>Van: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Verzonden: vrijdag, juni 13, 2008 08:40 PM
>
>You’re both right of course. I didn’t have that possibility in mind when
>writing my post to fop-dev. No warning needed indeed :-)
[Me: ]
>>> * if it is not a
Max Berger:
> since this came up, here is a list of tools I use for software quality
> checking (and all them them can check for generic list types). All of
> them have Eclipse and maven plugins (and ant tasks, and )
Incidentally, I would be happy too if we had some written-down
guidelines
17 matches
Mail list logo
