DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2012-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #19 from Glenn Ad

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2010-01-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2010-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #17 from Vincent Hennebert 2010-01-07 08:02:25 UTC --- I'm going to have a look at this. I'll investigate the idea mentioned in comment #11 to detach the region-viewport area and re-attach it to the page area corresponding to t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #16 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-15 12:02:19 PST --- BTW: Actually, quite a shame I didn't get near a solution, so far. I still think teaching AbstractBreaker to possibly deal with a sequence of block lists could be a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #15 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-15 11:53:03 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23495) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23495) patch not fixing the issue Tried my best to keep looking at the b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Andreas L. Delmelle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23090|1 |0 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-15 10:53:16 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) Hi Vincent My next attempt would probably go in that direction. If you look at what BlockContainerBreaker does, for example, this gives a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #13 from Chris Bowditch 2009-04-15 10:26:37 PST --- I certainly like your idea Vincent. Changing IPD is a known limitation of the current architecture of FOP so I think any solution to the disappearing content issue can ov

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #12 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-15 10:19:13 PST --- FWIW, for the moment, I have decided to do the following: -> committed most of the changes to PageBreaker.java to the trunk, since they're more cleanup and things t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #11 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-04-15 08:57:23 PST --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hi Andreas, > > I'd suggest you not to worry about changes in the number of columns, otherwise > you will indeed bump into the very problem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-14 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #10 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-14 16:23:59 PST --- Some more notes... Seems I'm unfortunately going to have to put this aside for the moment. It seems like I either sorely underestimated the complexity of the issue,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #9 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-04-06 11:05:42 PST --- Status update: Been busy attempting to complete the deferral mechanism. By itself, not very complicated changes (only 2 affected classes), but all sorts of other is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-03 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Andreas L. Delmelle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23090|0 |1 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #7 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-04-01 03:30:29 PST --- Hi Andreas, I'd suggest you not to worry about changes in the number of columns, otherwise you will indeed bump into the very problems that I am trying to solve at the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #6 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-31 13:48:13 PST --- For documentation purposes: Spent quite some time trying to get it working correctly, by deferring the part after the last page-break in case we have a last page-mast

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #5 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-28 08:13:06 PST --- Studying the effects of using a deferred block list, it is definitely not enough to simply carry those blocks over. Since they were created under the assumption of,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Andreas L. Delmelle changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23090|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime ty

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #4 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-25 13:29:19 PST --- Part of the issue already fixed locally by working with a deferred block list to which the elements of the part after the last break are added before continuing with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #3 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-23 16:00:24 PST --- Locally refactored the methods PageBreaker.doPhase3With...() into one restartAt() method. Besides the fact that one slightly larger method body saves about 20 lines

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 Andreas L. Delmelle changed: What|Removed |Added Platform|PC |All Version|0.95

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #2 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-03-22 02:05:00 PST --- Debugging this, I see that the last page-master triggers a restart of the algorithm, but the restarting point is assumed to be the last span change. The other span c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46486] page-position="last" causes blocks with span=all to disappear

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46486 --- Comment #1 from Chris Bowditch 2009-01-07 02:32:22 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23090) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23090) Sample FO to recreate bug -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache