RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-07-02 Thread Simon Steiner
Hi, I didn't include myself. Thanks -Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com] Sent: 02 July 2014 11:25 To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk Hi Simon, I counted 6 +1s; Simon, Chris, Clay, Pascal,

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-07-02 Thread Chris Bowditch
...@hotmail.co.uk] *Sent:* 27 June 2014 09:52 *To:* fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org *Subject:* RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk +1 Thanks, Robert Meyer Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:12:30 +0100 From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com

RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-27 Thread Simon Steiner
Hi, Thanks all for voting. The vote has now concluded and has passed with 5 +1 votes. Thanks From: Robert Meyer [mailto:rme...@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: 27 June 2014 09:52 To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk +1 Thanks, Robert Meyer

RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-27 Thread Robert Meyer
+1 Thanks, Robert Meyer Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 00:12:30 +0100 From: lmpmberna...@gmail.com To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk I tested the code with some examples from a weekly newsletter that I

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-26 Thread Luis Bernardo
I tested the code with some examples from a weekly newsletter that I receive -- this is a good example because the newsletter is always created using the same template and the same set of fonts (with a few exceptions). The code worked mostly well but the output was not perfect with some of

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-24 Thread Chris Bowditch
Hi Clay, I think the plan is to release FOP v2.0 very shortly together with Java 6. This is so we can include the font merging feature. So the last Java 5 compatible version will be v1.1. Thanks, Chris On 23/06/2014 16:34, Clay Leeds wrote: Will there be 'one last release using Java 5’ ena

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-23 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi, Very good work, Simon. +1 2014-06-23 17:34 GMT+02:00 Clay Leeds : > Will there be 'one last release using Java 5’ enabling the most widespread > use of the latest FOP development or does this mean that the last version of > Java 5 support will be FOP 1.1? > > Either way, I think this is a

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-23 Thread Clay Leeds
Will there be 'one last release using Java 5’ enabling the most widespread use of the latest FOP development or does this mean that the last version of Java 5 support will be FOP 1.1? Either way, I think this is a great improvement! Great work, Simon! +1 from me. On Jun 23, 2014, at 8:11 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FontMerging to trunk

2014-06-23 Thread Chris Bowditch
Hi Simon, This branch represents many months of hard work. Merging fonts within separate PDFs is far from a trivial task, and has been requested by almost everyone who uses the PDF Plug-in. Thanks you and well done on bringing the implementation to this point. I downloaded the branch and ran