Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi, Like Clay, I don't want to block the merge process, I just want to know about the future of Batik (more precisely the FOP dependency on it). So, consider that my vote is +1. Great job, Vincent. 2013/8/27 Clay Leeds > Well, I don't want to be a stock in the mud so here's my unconditional +1! > ;-) > > Cheers! > > Clay > > -- > > "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." > - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet > > > On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Robert Meyer wrote: > > +1 > > I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying. > > > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100 > > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk > > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > > > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > > > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > > > > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > > > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > > > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > > > be released first. > > > > > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > +1 > > > > I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that > > as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of > > Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the > > meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as > > mentioned by Luis. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vincent > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris > > -- pascal
Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Well, I don't want to be a stock in the mud so here's my unconditional +1! ;-) Cheers! Clay -- "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Aug 27, 2013, at 7:08 AM, Robert Meyer wrote: > +1 > > I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying. > > > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100 > > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk > > > > Hi Vincent, > > > > On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > > > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > > > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > > > > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > > > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > > > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > > > be released first. > > > > > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > > > > > +1 from me. > > > > +1 > > > > I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that > > as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of > > Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the > > meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as > > mentioned by Luis. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Vincent > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Chris
RE: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
+1 I think this sounds ok based on what Luis is saying. > Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:25:03 +0100 > From: bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com > To: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk > > Hi Vincent, > > On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > > be released first. > > > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > > > +1 from me. > > +1 > > I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that > as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of > Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the > meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as > mentioned by Luis. > > > > Thanks, > > Vincent > > > Thanks, > > Chris
Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi Vincent, On 21/08/2013 11:08, Vincent Hennebert wrote: This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to be released first. This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. +1 from me. +1 I also share the concerns of Pascal and Clay. However, I really see that as a separate discussion that the PMC needs to have about the future of Batik. I've been meaning to start it but I'm really busy ATM. In the meantime there is a practical solution to the dependency issue as mentioned by Luis. Thanks, Vincent Thanks, Chris
Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
+1 Since currently fop depends on a batik milestone release, not on trunk (except for the gump build), I see no problem replacing the current batik jar in the lib directory by a patched one. Note that the gump descriptor will need to be updated if the batik jar in fop is updated before the patch is applied to batik trunk. On 8/21/13 11:08 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to be released first. This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. +1 from me. Thanks, Vincent
Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
This looks like a great and important step. Nice work Vincent! I have similar concerns as Pancho, so when the BATIK patch is applied I'll vote +1. Regards, Clay Clay Leeds # 949-510-8993 @ the.webmaes...@gmail.com On Aug 21, 2013, at 4:30 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Hi, > > from [1], I understand that the BATIK patch is not yet applied on BATIK > trunk, so introducing a such dependency is not a good idea for the moment. > > I will vote +1 when the patch will be applied. > > For now, we depend on Batik team > > [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > > > 2013/8/21 Vincent Hennebert > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > be released first. > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > +1 from me. > > Thanks, > Vincent > > > > -- > pascal
Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_FopFontsForSVG into trunk
Hi, from [1], I understand that the BATIK patch is not yet applied on BATIK trunk, so introducing a such dependency is not a good idea for the moment. I will vote +1 when the patch will be applied. For now, we depend on Batik team [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel 2013/8/21 Vincent Hennebert > This work allows to directly use FOP-configured fonts for SVG images, > instead of trying to find, via AWT, equivalent fonts installed on the > system, and then mapping them to FOP fonts when generating the output. > > Please note that this introduces a dependency on the trunk version of > Batik, with the patch from BATIK-1041 applied. That means that before > releasing the next version of FOP, a new version of Batik will have to > be released first. > > This vote will run until Monday, 26 August 11:00 UTC. > > +1 from me. > > Thanks, > Vincent > -- pascal
