And the attachment illustrating the final rendering.
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> I decided not to send a request for clarification for this one, since
> the latest CSS 2.1 [1] Candidate Recommendation clears up that issue
> [2]. Excerpt from [2]:
> “Each row is as wide as the row groups and a
I decided not to send a request for clarification for this one, since
the latest CSS 2.1 [1] Candidate Recommendation clears up that issue
[2]. Excerpt from [2]:
“Each row is as wide as the row groups and as tall as a normal
(single-row-spanning) cell in the row. As with columns, the
On 29.06.2007 16:29:49 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> > Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
> > enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
> > but my personal preference would be the left solution. Shrug.
>
> Well,
Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
> Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
> enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
> but my personal preference would be the left solution. Shrug.
Well, section 7.28.5 in XSL-FO 1.1 (description of the
"border-sepa
On 6/29/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29.06.2007 14:07:51 Pascal Sancho wrote:
> 2/ XSLFO 6.7.9 says that fo:table-row "does not generate any areas".
>
> My question is: how to display row background if there is no area for it?
It's fo:table (6.7.3) that generates the areas
On 29.06.2007 14:07:51 Pascal Sancho wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Reading both CSS2 & XSLFO 1.1 specs,..
>
> 1/ CSS2 17.5.1 gives the order of tables layers.
> background-color default to transparent.
Yes, the order, but not the extents.
> 2/ XSLFO 6.7.9 says that fo:table-row "does not generate any areas
Hi,
Reading both CSS2 & XSLFO 1.1 specs,..
1/ CSS2 17.5.1 gives the order of tables layers.
background-color default to transparent.
2/ XSLFO 6.7.9 says that fo:table-row "does not generate any areas".
My question is: how to display row background if there is no area for it?
I see 2 answers:
1
I suppose when the spec is unclear common sense should prevail. So no
disagreements.
Adrian.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
but my personal preference would be the
Hmm, I don't find anything in XSL 1.1 or CSS 2 that would be clear
enough for either solution. So I can't say it's either left or right,
but my personal preference would be the left solution. Shrug.
On 29.06.2007 11:04:13 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I believe there's a bug in the handlin
