Re: svn commit: r709373 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop: ./ afp/ pdf/ render/ render/afp/ render/pdf/

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 31.10.2008 12:54:54 Adrian Cumiskey wrote: > Hi Jeremias, > > I understand what you are saying, its not ideal that it resides in > org.apache.fop. I'm trying to > keep it away separate from the render package as it could be plugged into any > engine (painter etc) > which uses the libraries

Re: svn commit: r709373 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop: ./ afp/ pdf/ render/ render/afp/ render/pdf/

2008-10-31 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi Jeremias, I understand what you are saying, its not ideal that it resides in org.apache.fop. I'm trying to keep it away separate from the render package as it could be plugged into any engine (painter etc) which uses the libraries. I guess we can move it to org.apache.fop.util for now, but

Re: svn commit: r709373 - in /xmlgraphics/fop/branches/Temp_AFPGOCAResources/src/java/org/apache/fop: ./ afp/ pdf/ render/ render/afp/ render/pdf/

2008-10-31 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Adrian, would you mind if I renamed AbstractData to AbstractStateData (if it has to be a top-level class) and moved it together with AbstractState and StateStack to org.apache.fop.util or org.apache.fop.util.state? I don't like those classes to be in the top-level FOP package. I'm also not sure if