6.09.2005 09:08:24 Manuel Mall wrote:
What is the correct amount of baseline shift to apply for sub and
super scripts? Batik seems to use +/- 0.5 * ascender height. Is
that the common way of doing it? The spec says only: "The offset
... is determined using the font data for the nominal fon
y easiest for now to do as Batik does. However, Type 1
> > fonts provide information about sub and super scripts (size and
> > placement) in the PFM file. That data is currently not parsed. I
> > assume there's something similar in TrueType. So ideally, the font
> > w
Vincent,
does FOray font expose this type of information Jeremias described
below?
Manuel
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:36 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> It's probably easiest for now to do as Batik does. However, Type 1
> fonts provide information about sub and super scripts (size and
>
It's probably easiest for now to do as Batik does. However, Type 1 fonts
provide information about sub and super scripts (size and placement) in
the PFM file. That data is currently not parsed. I assume there's
something similar in TrueType. So ideally, the font would supply the
infor
What is the correct amount of baseline shift to apply for sub and super
scripts? Batik seems to use +/- 0.5 * ascender height. Is that the
common way of doing it? The spec says only: "The offset ... is
determined using the font data for the nominal font".
Thanks
Manuel
