Nice work, Manuel! That will be a great addition to Fop.
I have never studied the problem in detail, so I can only give a general
opinion. But I think we should follow as closely as possible the Unicode
standard, even if that leads to behaviors incompatible with the current
one. It seems the Unico
Here is a sample from the test case I am developing attached.
The ..._old.pdf file shows the current fop-trunk behaviour while
the ..._new.pdf file shows what happens in the FOP UAX#14 version.
There are quite a few subtle differences (mostly for the better I hope).
I also attach the test case
On Thursday 21 December 2006 06:08, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Luca Furini wrote:
> > Another doubt: why aren't the "-" signs in text-align and
> > linefeed-treatment possible breaks?
>
> They should be, the dash in Unicode 5.0 has the property HY, which
> allows for a break after. The tables I genera
Luca Furini wrote:
After making the appropriate adjustment to the checks in that testcase
ALL testcases are now passing!
Wonderful!
Me too!
text-align="center" .conditionality="retain"
...
Does this happens because that space is just before a "."?
The dot ("FULL STOP") has property IS an
Manuel Mall wrote:
After making the appropriate adjustment to the checks in that testcase
ALL testcases are now passing!
Wonderful!
I'm really looking forward to see this great new feature!
Just a couple of doubts concerning the differences with respect to the old
implementation (I must con
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 20:43, Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:55, Manuel Mall wrote:
>
>
> > Its looking OK so far and most of the layout engine tests pass.
>
> Just discovered the first instance of an existing testcase which
> gives a different result.
Here is another
On Wednesday 20 December 2006 23:22, Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Manuel Mall wrote:
> > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:55, Manuel Mall wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Its looking OK so far and most of the layout engine tests pass.
> >
> > Just discovered the first instance of an existing testcase which
> > gives a
Manuel Mall wrote:
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:55, Manuel Mall wrote:
Its looking OK so far and most of the layout engine tests pass.
Just discovered the first instance of an existing testcase which gives a
different result. Under UAX#14 the following text (Note this is plain
text not
On Tuesday 19 December 2006 23:55, Manuel Mall wrote:
>
> Its looking OK so far and most of the layout engine tests pass.
Just discovered the first instance of an existing testcase which gives a
different result. Under UAX#14 the following text (Note this is plain
text not FO markup!):
text-a
Just a quick heads up that I finally took the plunge to add UAX#14 line
breaking to FOP. This is based on code donated by Joerg quite some time
ago on which I did some work in October 2005. This had been documented
on list at the time.
One of the major stumbling blocks in progressing this was t
10 matches
Mail list logo
