-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
Thanks for the example.
vMax is a string length in this example though, right? Correct me if
I'm wrong, but I don't think proportional-column-width() will work with
a string length will it?
Hmm.. Not sure
I think I'm getting the hang of installing fonts in fop, but I can't
find any site where I can download high-quality fonts.
I think adobe Type 1 fonts are preferable? I would like to have some of
the fonts I am use to, such as Bookman, New Century Schoolbook, etc.
Can anyone point me to a site?
Can't you just grab them out of the windows/fonts directory? Or am I
talking out my clack?
Chris.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2004 11:51 AM
To: fop mailing list
Subject: Where to download high-quality fonts
I think I'm
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 11:45:04AM +1000, Chris Warr wrote:
Can't you just grab them out of the windows/fonts directory? Or am I
talking out my clack?
Can you? I have a linux box. My girlfriend has a Macintosh, which puts
fonts in some type of suitcase. If you can just grab those
Pretty sure that's how we got our Arial font in there, don't know about the
legal issues though.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 26 May 2004 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where to download high-quality fonts
On Wed, May 26,
-Original Message-
From: Paul Tremblay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
snip /
Anyone every take a Windows font and use it in fop?
Sure! Happens all the time... Concerning Chris' question about the legal
issues, that's a whole different story (--the details of which I'm not too
Hi,*
I had a similar problem.
These 2 special fonts are only available in a normal format (neither bold nor
italic).
You should check if inherited properties affect thes 2 traits.
If this is the source problem, just add appropriate text-decoration=none and
font-weight=normal.
Tcho
-Message
Hi (2)
Alternative source problem:
The native charsets are limited to some characters. For example, in the symbol
font, normal letters (#x41; to #x7A;) are not implemented. If you need to use
greek characters, you must use appropriate charcodes (i.e. #x0391; as Alpha to
#x03D6; as omega).
I
Clay Leeds wrote:
snip/
I guess that's possible. It's also possible that whatever problem you're
having is due to portions of fop-0.20.5 not yet in compliance with the
spec (FOP is 'moving towards' the spec, but check the Compliance page[1]
to (currently shows 'basic' compliance, but not
Steven McNeel wrote:
(2) org.apache.fop.fo.PropertyList.findProperty - 26.4%
- this is the other main culprit. The time spent here is
divided fairly evenly among the following three methods of
PropertyListBuilder:
computeProperty - 8.8%
isCorrespondingForced - 5.7%
hi..
thanks guys for some answers...
i think i'll doing some experiments with the performance using the xalan...
i suspect that it was the FO-Processor that took the most resources,
because i have some graphics in the header, and page-citation in the footer
..
a little bit out of topic..
my
On May 25, 2004, at 14:42, Chris Bowditch wrote:
A.M. wrote:
Hi List- I am relatively new to FO. I am trying to
create a 2-column page with text that wraps into the
next column at a position on the page. I can see it is
possible by putting a leader in as shown in one of the
Apache FOP examples,
...
hi..
i got this error message everytime i run my fop
:
[WARNING] Sum of fixed column widths 793693 greater than maximum specified
IPD 0
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be specified
on table.
[ERROR] At least one of minimum, optimum, or maximum IPD must be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
hi..
i got this error message everytime i run my fop
:
[WARNING] Sum of fixed column widths 793693 greater than maximum specified
IPD 0
This error is simply saying that youve declared columns whose total width is
greater than the width of the page.
Column widths need
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
Thanks for the example.
vMax is a string length in this example though, right? Correct me if
I'm wrong, but I don't think
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:08, James Earl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Say you have a max record width (sum of all respective max field widths) of
65, then each column gets its width according to a calculation like
[( proportional-width / 65 ) *
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:12, James Earl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 10:08, James Earl wrote:
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 18:14, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Say you have a max record width (sum of all respective max field widths)
of
65, then each column gets its width according to a
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on
it's own rather than requiring special workarounds...
Julian
--
green/bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de --
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on
it's own rather than requiring special workarounds...
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:36, James Earl wrote:
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:32, Julian Reschke wrote:
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
I'm not sure if I'm doing this right... but the following gave
acceptable results:
snip /
Total: 53
So far, you're on the right track, but...
Calculations:
1. (20 / 53) * 33 = 12.5 (e.g.
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 11:50, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi James,
I'm not sure if I'm doing this right... but the following gave
acceptable results:
snip /
Total: 53
So far, you're on the right track,
-Original Message-
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Julian,
James Earl wrote:
...
Well, at least now I understand why! Man, this is easy, who needs auto
table layout!!!
Well. If it's that easy, I don't understand why FOP can't do this on
it's own rather
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote:
It also appears that I have CPU and memory problems with FOP due to too
complex tables.
I suspect this is be cause row and cell areas are referenced
from their corresponding FOs itself and are therefore kept
in memory together with all their descendants until the
24 matches
Mail list logo
