Hello Folks,
may i ask, how do u solve the problem with
keep with next?
i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the
next page.
or only the title shines in one page and the
text(paragraph) in the next?
Regards.
sako.
Hi Sako,
may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next?
i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the next page. or
only the title shines in one page and the text(paragraph) in the
next?
keep-with-next is only implemented for table rows, so one solution is
to create a table
-
From: Paul Vinkenoog [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FOP [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:01 PM
Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute)
Hi Sako,
may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next?
i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the next page. or
only
Title: RE: keep with next(Attribute)
You might want to look at XEP www.renderx.com
-Original Message-
From: Eclipse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute)
thank you for answer.
here is my
Could anybody help me with this task:
How to avoid FOP to place table header at the end of the page following with no
more rows on that page?
Setting keep-with-next on the last row of table's table-head doesn't work.
Table header is still at the bottom of the page.
Assuming this example
olts Jn wrote:
Could anybody help me with this task:
How to avoid FOP to place table header at the end of the page following with no
more rows on that page?
Setting keep-with-next on the last row of table's table-head doesn't work.
Table header is still at the bottom of the page.
As you
thanks
keep-together=always combined with keep-with-next solve my problem
- Original Message -
From: Chris Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:51 PM
Subject: RE: problem with two columns document and fo:table-row
keep-with-next=always
Are you
Hello,
I used fop 0.20.5
I make a document with two columns
I have a table and I want to keep row together; I
used fo:table-row keep-with-next="always"
but it work onlyat the end of thesecond
columns of the document and it doesn't work when the row I want to keep with
next is pla
There is a small fragment of my xsl-fo code:
keep-with-next=always on the first column it doesnt works:
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=1 number-columns-spanned=1
fo:block
fo:block font-size=15px space-after=0.5cm
font-weight=boldACTIVITÉS
Selber Jean-François wrote:
There is a small fragment of my xsl-fo code:
keep-with-next=always on the first column it doesnt works:
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=1 number-columns-spanned=1
fo:block
fo:block font-size=15px space-after=0.5cm
font-weight
Are you trying to keep everything in the table-row together, or keep the
contents of the table-row from being broken between itself and the next
table-row? If you want everything in the table-row together in the same
column, use keep-together=always, not keep-with-next. Remember, you're
acting
I want only to keep the row together with the next row .
it is why I used keep-with-next
- Original Message -
From: Chris Pratt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:51 PM
Subject: RE: problem with two columns document and fo:table-row
keep-with-next
-Original Message-
From: Selber Jean-François [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want only to keep the row together with the next row .
it is why I used keep-with-next
Hi,
Have you tried using the property components:
keep-with-next.within-line
keep-with-next.within-column
keep
Hi,
try keep-with-next.within-page=always instead of only
keep-with-next=always. This worked for me.
Bye,
Bernd
On Thursday 06 May 2004 18:56, Selber Jean-François wrote:
I want only to keep the row together with the next row .
it is why I used keep-with-next
Hi
I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3
rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows
together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do
this
xsl:for-each select=client
fo:table-row
From: Frank Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3
rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows
together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do
this
Your XSL-FO looks fine. keep-* properties are
-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 03:43
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next
From: Frank Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3
rows displaying the details of each client. I want
Frank Daly wrote:
fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always
Try keep-with-next=always. I think FOP ignores within-page
and uses within-column only.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Frank Daly wrote:
I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop
came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003.
This was an 0.20.5RCsomething. You can drop in the latest FOP jar
from a binary distro without problems. It wont make a difference
with
-Original Message-
From: Frank Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop
came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003.
That would probably be 0.20.4 or one of the 0.20.5 release candidates.
0.20.5
That worked. Thanks very much, enjoy your weekend.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 October 2003 04:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: keep-with-next
Frank Daly wrote:
fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always
Try
Title: Message
Hi
All,
Ablock with
keep-with-previous="always" does not behave the way I want it. Inspite of
putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a
non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work
around to acheive the desired behaviour?
Regards,
From: Ganesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
A block with keep-with-previous=always does not behave the way I want
it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour?
Ganesh wrote:
A block with keep-with-previous=always does not behave the way I want
it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between
pages.
a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block?
b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour?
That's a FAQ:
Bargel, Britta wrote:
I have two table-rows which should be on the same page. I have set the
propertie keep-wiht-next=always. Nevertheless those table rows are
separated by a page break.
If FOP can't fit a table onto a page due to keep constraints,
keeps are turned off for the rest of the table
|
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
||
If I remove the ``keep-with-next'' att., of course, I get lonely titles
wandering at the bottom of some pages.
Thanks in advance for the help
And if you set the keep-with-next only on the row with the title? That
will keep the title with at least one subseqent block.
On 28.05.2003 09:00:04 Nicolas Mazziotta wrote:
I use blind tables to prevent titles from being severed from the
following block. But...
If the block is too large
Chris Bowditch wrote:
what you need to solve this problem is widow and orphan properties on
fo:block. They control the minimum number of lines that are allowed to
appear by themselves, either at the start of a new page or at the bottom
of an existing page. Trouble is they are not implemented in
Haitham,
FWIW, I use fo:table-row keep-with-next=always/ and its works like a
champ for me. Have you done various experiments with only two or three
rows etc. to see under what conditions it does/doesn't work? In any
event, I can assure you that under at least some conditions, it does
work
appropriate attributes
to the items' corresponding xml-elements. The carry over values then are
placed into markers. Additionaly, always 3 items (= fo:table-rows) are set
to keep together using keep-with-next=always. Doing so, retrieving the
markers fails (first-starting and last-ending). FOP returns
Hi all,
according to the compliance document, keep-with-next is supported on table
rows. The sample file keep.fo also demonstrates keep-with-previous working.
But extending that sample in a way, that a table does not fit on two pages,
the keep-directives do not work any more. Making separate
this by adding appropriate attributes
to the items' corresponding xml-elements. The carry over values then are
placed into markers. Additionaly, always 3 items (= fo:table-rows) are set
to keep together using keep-with-next=always. Doing so, retrieving the
markers fails (first-starting and last-ending). FOP
Müller, Markus wrote:
according to the compliance document, keep-with-next is supported on table
rows. The sample file keep.fo also demonstrates keep-with-previous working.
But extending that sample in a way, that a table does not fit on two pages,
the keep-directives do not work any more. Making
i think keep with next work with table rows only
- Original Message -
From: Karen Mergner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:23 AM
Subject: keep-with-next
Hi all,
I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page
Karen Mergner wrote:
I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page,
but it dosn't work.
This is a FAQ
http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#faq-N101F7
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo,
when will be supported the following attributes:
fo:block keep-with-next.within-column=always
fo:block widows=
fo:table table-layout= auto
Merry Xmas
Frens Peters
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when will be supported the following attributes:
When FOP1.0 is released. Don't ask when it'll happen.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 19 Dec 2002 at 13:23, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when will be supported the following attributes:
When FOP1.0 is released. Don't ask when it'll happen.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn Technologies, Israel
5:13 PM
Subject: Re: oprhan/window control, blind tables, keep-with-next etc
Eddy De Clercq wrote:
I've seen in the archives lots of threads in the FOP mailing
list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on when features
like
orphan/widow control, keep-with-next will be implented
On Thursday 12 December 2002 08:26, Eddy De Clercq wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the answer. Since there is no release date for
implementing this, are there alternatives for FOP which handle
widow/orphans already?
Maybe you should check out XEP (http://www.renderx.com/FO2PDF.html).
It comes with
Eddy De Clercq wrote:
Thanks for the answer. Since there is no release date for implementing this,
are there alternatives for FOP which handle widow/orphans already?
You name it in the subject: blind table with keep-together properties on
table-rows.
--
Oleg Tkachenko
eXperanto team
Multiconn
Hi,
I've seen in the archives lots of threadsin
the FOP mailing listconcerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on
when features like
orphan/widow control, keep-with-next will be
implented in FOP and Cocoon?
Many thanks
Eddy De Clercq
I have found when I use the keep-with-next and
keep-with-previous attributes in my table that after a page break the
formatting of the row is lost. All text is left justified instead of the indent
I requested. The final row on the previous page and next row after the
break point
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002
8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: keep-with-next formatting
problem
I have found when I use the
keep-with-next and keep-with-previous attributes in my table that after a page
break the formatting of the row is lost. All text is left
Eddy De Clercq wrote:
I've seen in the archives lots of threads in the FOP mailing
list concerning this matter. Is ther any news/update on when features like
orphan/widow control, keep-with-next will be implented in FOP and Cocoon?
Not really, they are addressed by the redesign under way.
--
Oleg
Matthias Brunner wrote:
Is there a planned release date (+/- 3 months)?
No, unless quite some time ago counts.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Matt Frame wrote:
I have found when I use the keep-with-next and keep-with-previous
attributes in my table that after a page break the formatting of the row
is lost. All text is left justified instead of the indent I requested.
The final row on the previous page and next row after the break
Hi!
I have a table cell that spans multiple pages. Inside this table cell I
would like to use the keep-with-next on a block to make sure this block
and the next block is at the same page.
FOP does not seem to care about this. The two blocks sometimes appears
on different pages.
Does FOP support
Morten Isaksen wrote:
I have a table cell that spans multiple pages. Inside this table cell I
would like to use the keep-with-next on a block to make sure this block
and the next block is at the same page.
FOP does not seem to care about this. The two blocks sometimes appears
on different pages
Title: keep-with-next and small-caps
I have two problems:
I'm trying to keep multiple rows together, like so:
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
fo:table-row
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
Berg, Philip wrote:
I'm trying to keep multiple rows together, like so:
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
fo:table-row keep-with-next=always
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
fo:table-row
[ cells ]
/fo:table-row
That doesn't seem to keep it together though
Hello,
what about the state of keep-with-next in fo:block? I want to
keep headings together with their following paragraphs, but
keep-with-next=always does not work within fo:block tags.
Is it planned to release a new version of fop in the near future?
Another question: Is it planned
Martin Stockhammer wrote:
what about the state of keep-with-next in fo:block? I want to
keep headings together with their following paragraphs, but
keep-with-next=always does not work within fo:block tags.
Is it planned to release a new version of fop in the near future?
It wont be in the next
I would like to keep together on a same page a group of table rows. I used
keep-with-next=always and all except the last fo:table-row elements of the
group, but for the attached XFO document (a course schedule), a page-break
occurs in the middle of a group of 9 rows (16:15), between pages 2 and 3
I would like to keep together on a same page a group of table rows. I used
keep-with-next=always and all except the last fo:table-row elements of the
group, but for the attached XFO document (a course schedule), a page-break
occurs in the middle of a group of 9 rows (16:15), between pages 2 and 3
Hy all,
I have a problem with the keep-with-next property.
I use an outer table containing a single row.
This row can contain multiple tables, blocks an so on depending on data.
I want to achieve, that data of the outer row is kept together on one page.
But when I use keep
: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 5:20 AM
Subject: keep-with-next
Hi!
keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as
'implemented'
in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone
had
any experience with this one?
I use block objects to implement headings
Michal Kwiatek wrote:
keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as 'implemented'
in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone had
any experience with this one?
The properties keep-with-next and keep-with-previous are
only implemented for table rows.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: fop-dev@xml.apache.org
ix.com cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: keep-with-next
I should be more specific - what I mean is; I would like to try to get
keep-with-next/previous working with fo:block elements.
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002, David Wood wrote:
I am a Java coder and know my way around the standard. I volunteer to try
to fix this, if someone who is more familiar
60 matches
Mail list logo
