Re: New FOP release?

2002-05-15 Thread L Rutker
Sadly this is the reason the project I was with dumped FOP in favor of a 
proprietary pdf output solution, one that is sadly very inferior to FOP in 
capibilities and standards (no its not renderx but an other reporting 
package that has PDF output.


I had another phone call with a major governmental institution. They
would love to go the FO way if its future was not so blurred, we would
even contribute to some code (I need line numbering in) and fix bugs.
If only we has some visibility. Currently, my choice is RenderX (but
this institution does not like getting locked into a small company) and
a traditional proprietary solution (e.g. 3B2, Compuset). I would love to
be able to tell them : in 6 months time the redesign will be finished,
windows/orphan, keep-with-next and, I don't know, landscaped
block-containers will be working.
P. Andries

_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.


Re: New FOP release?

2002-05-15 Thread Patrick Lanphier
It's OK to mention names.  We like to know what people are using.

Patrick Lanphier
The Artemis Group
http://www.artemisgroup.com
phone: 814-235-0444
  fax: 800-582-9710

On Wed, 15 May 2002, L Rutker wrote:

 Sadly this is the reason the project I was with dumped FOP in favor of a
 proprietary pdf output solution, one that is sadly very inferior to FOP in
 capibilities and standards (no its not renderx but an other reporting
 package that has PDF output.


 
 I had another phone call with a major governmental institution. They
 would love to go the FO way if its future was not so blurred, we would
 even contribute to some code (I need line numbering in) and fix bugs.
 If only we has some visibility. Currently, my choice is RenderX (but
 this institution does not like getting locked into a small company) and
 a traditional proprietary solution (e.g. 3B2, Compuset). I would love to
 be able to tell them : in 6 months time the redesign will be finished,
 windows/orphan, keep-with-next and, I don't know, landscaped
 block-containers will be working.
 
 P. Andries
 


 _
 Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.




Re: New FOP release?

2002-05-14 Thread L Rutker
I have asked the question more than once in the past.
No one on this list seems to know anything about the development / rewrite 
of fop.

I wish you luck with your search but I doubt you will find an answer on this 
list.

Lou

From: joseph berdat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FopUser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New FOP release?
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 17:11:52 -0400
Hi,
Is there a new released of FOP scheduled for soon?
And on what kind of subject is currently developed on FOP for next release?
thank'S
@+

_
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
http://www.hotmail.com



Re: New FOP release?

2002-05-14 Thread Patrick Andries

Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The problem is rather that the questions gets posted a lot and the
response is always the same. Maybe people are getting tired of
responding to them. The mailing list archives contain a lot of similar
answers.
Why not post the latest status on the Web ?
It comes down to this: FOP is in redesign (announced on the website).
Yes.
All current releases come from a maintenance branch where relatively
little is going on. That means releases don't come out too often,
especially because this involves a lot of work. If you think that the
current CVS version contains fixes you really need you can ask that a
release be made as soon as possible. But don't expect too much at the
moment. New features (especially concerning FO conformance) are not
likely to appear. FOP has to be redesigned to allow that.
Yes.
And I believe this is the answer we are looking for : how far is it in 
its redesign ?

I had another phone call with a major governmental institution. They 
would love to go the FO way if its future was not so blurred, we would 
even contribute to some code (I need line numbering in) and fix bugs.
If only we has some visibility. Currently, my choice is RenderX (but 
this institution does not like getting locked into a small company) and 
a traditional proprietary solution (e.g. 3B2, Compuset). I would love to 
be able to tell them : in 6 months time the redesign will be finished, 
windows/orphan, keep-with-next and, I don't know, landscaped 
block-containers will be working.

P. Andries