At 08:27 12/03/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
> I'm not familiar with FOP, but I can't help noticing
> that people are moving from FOP to iText and vice versa.
> As original developer of iText, a JAVA-PDF library, I already
> proposed you guys at Apache twice to join forces and to combine
From: "New, Cecil (GEAE)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My suggestion was *not* to merge the two!
>
> iText is a Java API with a document creation focus. In this day and age,
> XSL:FO can be viewed as just another document type - in the same way that
> more proprietary or older formats are (that is, PDF,
: fop-dev@xml.apache.org; itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [iText-questions] Re: merging two libraries
Hi,
From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though). It is certainly time to
revisit.
From the small amou
ECTED]
Cc: fop-dev@xml.apache.org; itext-questions@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: merging two libraries
Hi,
From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though). It is certainly time to
revisit.
From the small amount of informati
Hi,
From the archives it appears that the discussion on the fop-dev list was
about 2 years ago (no apparent refusal though). It is certainly time to
revisit.
From the small amount of information I know about iText it would appear
to be a more advanced pdf library.
I don't know what the license
