On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:32:30 Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
> Not really. It's a matter of using common sense, I guess...
> Putting all content together inside one and the same page-sequence is
> bound to get you in trouble.
Is there an alternative for situations where the content comes from elsewh
Hello,
I'm using this DocBook customization:
It left aligns , but it also has the side effect of completely
screwing up acronyms. It makes acronyms appear a line beneath the gloss
term and also seems to make acronym spill over to the next page without
keeping together with the rest of
On Jul 10, 2007, at 11:24, Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Adrian
Yes I also verified this problem. This is a different bug to the
other force-page-count problem which was fixed (http://
issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42779). Please open a
new bug entry.
I'm not following... bug 4
Adrian Cumiskey wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
Yes I also verified this problem. This is a different bug to the other
force-page-count problem which was fixed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42779). Please open
a new bug entry.
Thanks Adrian. I think we can summarise this bug
Hi Guillaume,
Yes I also verified this problem. This is a different bug to the other
force-page-count problem which was fixed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42779). Please open
a new bug entry.
Adrian.
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Guillaume,
guillaume levrero a écrit
Hi,
leeloo5e79-devel yahoo de a écrit :
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> you are correct: RTF is a terrible format. But seems to be the only way to
> get a modifiable document. There are also tools like which convert PDF to
> Word-Documents. But these tools also had the problem in correct converting
> PDF.
Hi Jeremias,
you are correct: RTF is a terrible format. But seems to be the only way to get
a modifiable document. There are also tools like which convert PDF to
Word-Documents. But these tools also had the problem in correct converting PDF.
In this case I'm using DocBook to create complex docu
Hi Adrian,
sorry for my late reply. Seems my email-provider are sorting out some messages.
I just find the list on nabbles.com.
I used Microsoft Word to display the generated RTF-Output. So I assumed
Microsoft Word would display the RTF in the correct way. But seems it didn't.
Because of your
Hi Guillaume,
guillaume levrero a écrit :
> Hi Chris,
>
>
> I tried the FO again with the latest foptrunk (554616), and I get the same
> output.
>
> Should I open a new bug entry ?
Yes, please, I can reproduce the problem. Obviously there is still
something wrong somewhere.
Thanks,
Vincent
