AW: keep is not auto but context is

2009-08-25 Thread Georg Datterl
Hi Andreas, Nope, doesn't bother me that much, since it makes no difference. Regards, Georg Datterl -- Kontakt -- Georg Datterl Geneon media solutions gmbh Gutenstetter Straße 8a 90449 Nürnberg HRB Nürnberg: 17193 Geschäftsführer: Yong-Harry Steiert Tel.: 0911/36 78 88 - 26

AW: Display of fractions

2009-08-25 Thread Georg Datterl
Hi Andreas, You are right. Both pdfs are created from the same fo file, but the one which doesn't work as expected is reformatted by Xmlspy first. And there's no way as far as I can see, to keep the inlines in one line. Well, doesn't matter. I was hoping it would be a clue to improve the

Re: keep is not auto but context is

2009-08-25 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Andreas Delmelle wrote: On 24 Aug 2009, at 17:58, Andreas Delmelle wrote: On 24 Aug 2009, at 15:00, Georg Datterl wrote: What does this message mean? It's a warning message, indicating that the current keep-context is set to auto, but the keep-property specified on the FO for which

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread TomWilcox
Hi Guys, Sorry to return your attention to this aging thread! I am knee deep in IF and I have a been attempting to divine what each of the different node attributes represent such as bpd (block progression dimension?), etc. It would be really good to have a definitive description of the

AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread Georg Datterl
Hi Tom, bpd is the HEIGHT of the area. prod-id is the reference attribute id. Those are the ones I use extensively. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Georg Datterl -- Kontakt -- Georg Datterl Geneon media solutions gmbh Gutenstetter Straße 8a 90449 Nürnberg HRB Nürnberg: 17193

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
There's no formal documentation of the area tree XML format to date. It is something very very few people need to use and the whole thing grew organically over time, so documentation wasn't a top priority. A contribution in this direction would be highly welcome. I'm happy to fill in any blanks if

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread TomWilcox
Hi Jeremias and Georg, Thanks very much. That's really helpful and at least good to know that no proper documentation exists. I have taken the liberty of starting a wiki to share this information whilst I attempt to accumulate more info about the IF tree. If anyone would like to contribute

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread TomWilcox
Hi Jeremias and Georg, Thanks very much. That's really helpful and at least good to know that no proper documentation exists. I have taken the liberty of starting a wiki to share this information whilst I attempt to accumulate more info about the IF tree. If anyone would like to contribute

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Tom, that's great, but why don't you just use our main Wiki? http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ Another request: Please call this area tree XML rather than intermediate format. Yes, we called it that in the past but we have two intermediate formats now, so it's necessary to keep the two

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread TomWilcox
OK Can do.. Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote: Tom, that's great, but why don't you just use our main Wiki? http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ Another request: Please call this area tree XML rather than intermediate format. Yes, we called it that in the past but we have two intermediate

Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Area Tree Handling

2009-08-25 Thread TomWilcox
Alright Jeremias I have created a page for the AT XML Documentation on the FOP wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/AreaTreeXMLDocumentation I have taken the liberty of adding a link to it on the main page to encourage awareness.. Thanks for your help. Tom Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:

Re: keep is not auto but context is

2009-08-25 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On 25 Aug 2009, at 12:22, Vincent Hennebert wrote: Keeps do /not/ apply to fo:table-cell: http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#fo_table-cell snip / So whatever that warning means, it is not related to tables. OK, so I guess it's just a coincidence that the warning appears only in table-related

Fwd: Love Apache? Give Back with a MyApache Shoutout!

2009-08-25 Thread Simon Pepping
-- Forwarded message -- From: Sally Khudairi s...@apache.org Subject: Love Apache? Give Back with a MyApache Shoutout! The Apache Software Foundation has become a worldwide force in the software industry because of the diverse programs, applications,and tools built on its projects

Issue with table border in afp when reference orientation is mentioned for a fo:block-container

2009-08-25 Thread Tecra
Hello Everybody, Can any one guide me how to fix this issue. when i use table border for a table in fo. It displays fine when using it normally but in afp when you try to rotate the table say 90 degrees the border-color is applying for the whole cell and i could'nt see anything. Did anyone