Re: keep-together.within-column with content 1 page

2010-05-26 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi Brad, what you need is an integer value for the keep-together.* property. integer value is not supported by FOP 0.95, but FOP TRUNK has a minimal support on it. try it, it can give you expected result. -- Pascal Le 25/05/2010 21:02, Brad Smith a écrit : Hello, I have certain elements in

Re: keep-together.within-column with content 1 page

2010-05-26 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Brad, instead of using keep-together.within-column=always, try keep-together.within-column=1. All integer values will be interpreted by FOP with the same strength, though. Full support for integer values is not available, yet. But at least this will allow the layout engine to break parts greater

AW: keep-together.within-column with content 1 page

2010-05-26 Thread Georg Datterl
Hi Brad, keep-together=always doesn't work, because it's a short for three keeps, including keep-together.within-line, which you most likely don't want. Keep-together.within-column is the correct way. But always is too strong. Try keep-together.within-column=5. Numbers are not completely

Re: Log4j Woes

2010-05-26 Thread nancy_b
Hi dear Peter, This time you've hit the target! :-) Thanks a lot for your help!!! Nancy Peter Hancock-2 wrote: Hi Nancy, The suggested method fails because all arguments to fop are passed as arguments to the application, not the JVM. You could change the fop script and add