Bob,
IIRC, you are putting a 900px file into a 25pt area. FOP should shrink it to
fit, but I suspect it still has issues doing this with large jpgs. Other image
types (gif etc) work better.
Cheers,
Roland
From: bob swanson [mailto:bobswans...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, 13 May 2013 12:51 PM
To:
As far as an XML parser is concerned you have 3 nodes within the “para”
element; two separate text nodes with the PI in between them.
Your XSL would need to string both text nodes together instead of just showing
the first one.
I’m a bit rusty on this sorry, but there should be a couple of ways
Shruti,
I vaguely recall that marker formats are controlled where you set them, not
where you retrieve them.
Regards,
Roland
-Original Message-
From: shrutin [mailto:shru...@mastek.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 September 2009 3:18 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Horizontal
Jeff,
From experience:
Don't use transparency in gif's.
Don't use oversized jpeg's expect scaling down to work in PCL, it doesn't.
I convert all images to non-transparent gif they work in both PCL and
PDF. PCL versions of the image are lower quality slightly shrunken,
but workable.
BMP
Ulrich,
We found fop 0.20.5 required these fonts on some RH versions, even in
headless mode:
xorg-x11-deprecated-lib
The fop errors we saw were different, but still misleading.
I don't think java 1.6 was around when that version of FOP was written
either FWIW.
Regards,
*Roland *
Ulrich
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/pdfencryption.html
Regards,
*Roland*
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We are using Pdf encryption of FOP 0.20 and we are getting following error.
Please guide us on the same
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot find any provider supporting RC4
at
GNU Classpath (used by
GCJ, Kaffee etc.).
On 10.04.2008 03:46:28 Roland Neilands wrote:
Hello foppers,
We've just put a watermark on our documents it works fine on two PC's
using FOP 0.20.5, 0.93 0.94.
It's completely ignored on two linux servers (tested with same 3 fop
versions
Hello foppers,
We've just put a watermark on our documents it works fine on two PC's
using FOP 0.20.5, 0.93 0.94.
It's completely ignored on two linux servers (tested with same 3 fop
versions). The rest of the document renders fine, just no watermark,
except for 20.5 which fails with an
Just a thought but you could put it into a BLOB in a DB apply your
security to accessing that.
Alternatively encrypt the filesystem pdf for reading provide the
password separately.
Regards,
Roland
Woodhouse, Graeme wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for your help - as a bit of a test I tried
Trevor,
This is something you provide contingency in XSL-FO for, not something
you need to do manually on every page.
Search the list archives for fo:marker fo:retrieve marker look for
same in the examples directory.
Anyone care to update the FAQ for this? I can provide better wording.
? Does it print
correctly on those printers or not? What's the problem?
On 31.07.2007 08:48:08 Roland Neilands wrote:
I suggest PCL6 support.
A late response I know, but this just came up recently I can't work
around it.
PCL 5 support is being dropped from some new printers it seems:
http
I suggest PCL6 support.
A late response I know, but this just came up recently I can't work
around it.
PCL 5 support is being dropped from some new printers it seems:
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bc/docs/support/SupportManual/c00878487/c00878487.pdf
This has happened a couple of times recently,
Jenkins, Mark wrote:
Guys,
When is PDF encryption necessary?
...
Is it just to add restrictions on how the document can or cannot be
manipulated(print, edit,etc.)?
Yes, that's it.
Cheers,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe,
-q command line option or if embedded maybe logging levels in faq
Regards,
Roland
This e-mail is solely for the use of the intended recipient and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. Unauthorised use of its
contents is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
Ian,
This is a basic XML parsing question, not particular to FOP:
Use the XML prolog standalone attribute to prevent the DTD lookup.
eg:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 standalone=yes?
Regards,
Roland
Ian Burrell wrote:
We are getting intermittent failures making PDF from XSL-FO with SVG
Check the FAQ:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/running.html#memory
Regards,
Roland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I am trying to convert a huge XML document(approx about 110 pages
long, 777KB) into a pdf document using an FO transformation. But it
gives me the following
Rick,
I don't think you need to cd, just run it with it's absolute path name
or add the dir it's in to your %PATH%.
A bit of code from the one I use, the comments may help you (XP is NT).
I commented them because my fop.bat is not in the FOP install directory:
set
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roland Neilands wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. 20.5 wants height/width on the block container.
...
fo:external-graphic content-height=3cm content-width=3cm
FOP 0.20.5 doesn't support content-heigth/width either. Height
and width work.
I know, it ignores them
Roland Neilands wrote:
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Roland Neilands wrote:
Sorry, my mistake. 20.5 wants height/width on the block container.
...
fo:external-graphic content-height=3cm
content-width=3cm
FOP 0.20.5 doesn't support content-heigth/width either. Height
and width work.
I
Suresh,
What you've done is correct, but not supported by the old version of FOP
- try the beta release, or use height width attributes as well. Search
this list's archives for more details, this has come up a few times.
Regards,
Roland
Suresh Koya wrote:
Hi,
I am using FOP 0.20.5. I
Koya wrote:
I checked this with the beta build also. I could not get it to work.
Should I file a bug to this respect.
Regards,
Suresh Koya
*/Roland Neilands [EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
Suresh,
What you've done is correct, but not supported by the old version
of FOP
- try
I've seen this too. I just turned off transparency in the gif in an
image editor and it worked fine.
Cheers,
Roland
Zmitko, Jan wrote:
Hallo Together,
I´ve an problem with printing my PDF generated by FOP 0.20.5. The generated
PDF looks corectly, however if I print these on my printer, the
Patrick,
Your examples are too basic, missing all of the page structure information.
Have a look at the .fo examples in your fop install directory.
Cheers,
Roland
Patrick Proctor wrote:
I have the same problem, and I think it may be a bug. I have used FOP
examples from O'Reilly and W3C and
Paul,
It can be changed but the default is, eg:
C:\Program Files\Java\jre1.5.0_04\
JDK install path is slightly different, but it's unlikely you'd have that.
Cheers,
Roland
Paul Tremblay wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Dirk Bromberg wrote:
From: Dirk Bromberg [EMAIL
Thom,
Opening your .fo in IE: Line 3 Char 125. An invalid character was found
in text context.
Did you save as utf-8? Looks like ansi to me. UTF-8 is the default for
XML, but not for most text editors. The encoding attribute must match
the file (eg encoding=ISO-8859-1 works for this file).
at the area tree that 0.90 generates, the result
is correct.
On 15.12.2005 23:47:31 Roland Neilands wrote:
Jeremias,
Try the large block in 20.5 - it fits with no overflow. There seems to
be extra space between lines in .90
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.12.2005 07:19:31 Roland
Jeremias,
Try the large block in 20.5 - it fits with no overflow. There seems to
be extra space between lines in .90
Cheers,
Roland
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 12.12.2005 07:19:31 Roland Neilands wrote:
snip/
5. There seems to be extra space inserted between lines now. This breaks
Jeremias,
I haven't test it thoroughly yet, but you asked, so but here's what I've
seen:
1. Images are not scaled overrun block-container height width. The
images seem washed-out pixelated (gif). This is a stopper, I was
hoping it would work better than 20.5.
fo:block-container
Jeremias,
7. It seems to have the old bug of leaving zero sized files around after
errors
Cheers,
Roland
Roland Neilands wrote:
Jeremias,
I haven't test it thoroughly yet, but you asked, so but here's what
I've seen:
1. Images are not scaled overrun block-container height width
command line yourself.
On 16.11.2005 03:04:22 Roland Neilands wrote:
Does anyone know if it's possible to check the value of FOP command line
arguments within XSL, specifically the chosen output format?
eg I have one stylesheet which may produce PDF and/or PCL from the same
XML file depending
Hi,
Does anyone know if it's possible to check the value of FOP command line
arguments within XSL, specifically the chosen output format?
eg I have one stylesheet which may produce PDF and/or PCL from the same
XML file depending on local setup.
PCL is mainly for non-PS printers faxes, so I
Louis,
I beleive it is not implemented in FOP.
Use fo:marker instead for this instead, there are plenty of examples in
the list archive and your fop/examples directory, sorry don't have time
to dig them up right now.
Cheers,
Roland
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a layout such that:
Ashley,
To stop editing you can use this:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/pdfencryption.html
To wrap at 80 chars there are several solutions, but it really depends on your
situation: as Jay suggested you might be trying to do
something XSL-FO does automatically better.
For a preformatted text
Mike,
However - my main question still remains:
Why - when an image is displayed 'correctly' - does making the
block-container BIGGER make the image vanish?
Does anyone else have any experience of this?
Yes, if the block-container no longer fits wholly within static-content for
example, it
David,
A couple of notes from experience:
Don't use transparency in GIF's (goes black).
Don't use JPG for PCL output (can crash FOP).
Don't scale images containing text (pixelates: use a factor of 2 if necessary).
Cheers,
Roland
-Original Message-
From: David 'Dox' Shevitz
35 matches
Mail list logo
