Hi,
rant
There seems to be a misconception frequently found in the SVG/PDF
community that because vector graphics can be scaled with no change in
image quality, they are somehow 'independent' of notions of
resolution. Unfortunately, this isn't correct. Any piece of vector
image must be
Hi Martin,
Unless I misunderstood you, this is a different topic. If all the
dimensions in the file are given using absolute units (pt, mm, in,
etc.), then the file is indeed independent of any resolution. It is up
to the output device to convert those measures into the right amount of
pixels,
Hi,
Like you noticed the resolution only applies to images. I am slightly
puzzled by the way you compare both outputs: are you putting the sheet
of paper next to the screen and looking for differences?
Then note that the HTML result is likely to be highly different from one
environment to the
Hi Vincent,
Having got my rant / off my chest, I won't argue with you - it is,
as you say, a little off-topic. My gripe is with the definition, not
the implementation!
best wishes,
Martin
On 24 Apr 2009, at 11:54, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Martin,
Unless I misunderstood you, this is
Hi,
Like you noticed the resolution only applies to images. I am slightly
puzzled by the way you compare both outputs: are you putting the sheet
of paper next to the screen and looking for differences?
I have a table with fixed-size width and a large chunk of text inside (so that
is
Hello list!
I have an XML file which is either converted to PDF (via FOP) or to XHTML (via
another XSL stylesheet)
I have noticed however that things look different in (printed) PDF and
(on-screen) HTML formats.
The sizes are different for the text elements.
After searching for a cause it
