Re: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid

with the newer batik. Thanks *From:*Dean Nelson *Sent:* 26 March 2019 16:38 *To:* fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org *Subject:* RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid All, It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version that could be used with 2.3. Right now I am stuck with FOP 2.2 because of this change. Right

RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid

Hi, The developer of JEuclid will need to be contacted to update their code to work with the newer batik. Thanks From: Dean Nelson Sent: 26 March 2019 16:38 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid All, It would be nice to produce a jEuclid version

RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid

/jeuclid ? Regards, Dean Nelson From: Simon Steiner Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2019 3:32 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid Hi, In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace since we don’t own org.w3c. https://issues.apache.org

RE: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid

Hi, In order to make batik compile under java 10, we had to rename the namespace since we don’t own org.w3c. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BATIK-1216 Thanks From: Maxime Bégnis Sent: 26 March 2019 08:21 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: FOP 2.3 and JEuclid