Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-05 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 5, 2007, at 21:13, Khaled Aly wrote: Andreas L Delmelle wrote: For more info, see also: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/ download.html It is where I downloaded my 0.94 binary last week. OK, see the section on 'Source Download' for more info, and if you're serious about having a

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-05 Thread Khaled Aly
Andreas L Delmelle wrote: For more info, see also: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/download.html It is where I downloaded my 0.94 binary last week. and we do not serve binaries off the Trunk. Sorry again: what means not serve them? I see there is a last update date next to each src or bi

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-05 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 5, 2007, at 20:08, Khaled Aly wrote: Hi Khaled What do you mean by the FOP trunk? Sorry, I always forget that this doesn't ring a bell with fop- users... :( Anyway, FOP Trunk is the latest source code as available in the Subversion repository. Development on FOP is never halted. S

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-05 Thread Khaled Aly
Andreas What do you mean by the FOP trunk? I ensured the error was there on both Apache FOP download page and oXygen 9Beta2, which has just been released last week (though doesn't mean its embedded FOP 0.94 fix had been updated). Thanks Khaled Andreas L Delmelle wrote: On Nov 3, 2007, at 2

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-05 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi Andreas, Khaled, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Nov 3, 2007, at 22:09, Khaled Aly wrote: > > > > Hi Khaled / Vincent, > > As a heads-up: I just tried running the attached FO through FOP trunk, > and it seems to work fine. > > Seems that the issue then is restricted to the 0.94 release, but

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-04 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 3, 2007, at 22:09, Khaled Aly wrote: Hi Khaled / Vincent, As a heads-up: I just tried running the attached FO through FOP trunk, and it seems to work fine. Seems that the issue then is restricted to the 0.94 release, but has been resolved in the meantime (?) Cheers Andreas -

RE: proper fop command line

2007-11-03 Thread Khaled Aly
al Message- | From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 11:59 AM | To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org | Subject: Re: proper fop command line | . | | Sorry that I didn't follow the thread very closely. Do you | still have the error messages

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-02 Thread Vincent Hennebert
Hi, Andreas L Delmelle wrote: > On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:29, Khaled Aly wrote: > >> Thanks Andreas for your willingness to help. I got it working fine with >> 0.93, which is the version used by oXygen 8.2 (that's why I never noticed >> there was a problem; somehow 0.93 is forgiving about the particu

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-01 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:29, Khaled Aly wrote: Thanks Andreas for your willingness to help. I got it working fine with 0.93, which is the version used by oXygen 8.2 (that's why I never noticed there was a problem; somehow 0.93 is forgiving about the particular issue). When I tried same on oXyg

RE: proper fop command line

2007-11-01 Thread Khaled Aly
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org | Subject: Re: proper fop command line | | On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:29, Khaled Aly wrote: | | Hi Khaled | | > - I have my Java_Home environment variable pointing to the root of | > jdk1.5.0_09, the version I got installed. I see the FOP downloads | > label

Re: proper fop command line

2007-11-01 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:29, Khaled Aly wrote: Hi Khaled - I have my Java_Home environment variable pointing to the root of jdk1.5.0_09, the version I got installed. I see the FOP downloads labeled jdk1.3 and jdk1.4. I assume my JDK version should be backward compatible and this could not be

FW: proper fop command line

2007-11-01 Thread Khaled Aly
or is there a known fix for this issue for fop 0.2? Thanks again Khaled | -Original Message- | From: Khaled Aly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:45 PM | To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org | Subject: RE: proper fop command line | | Andreas | Thanks for that.

RE: proper fop command line

2007-10-31 Thread Khaled Aly
Andreas Thanks for that. I'll try to reduce and see where the problems are. |-Original Message- |From: Andreas L Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:53 PM |To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org |Subject: Re: proper fop command line | |On Oct 30,

Re: proper fop command line

2007-10-30 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Oct 30, 2007, at 22:41, Khaled Aly wrote: Thanks and sorry that your response got mis-filed, I just read it. I tried 'java -cp ... org.apache.fop.cli.Main file.fo file.fo file.pdf' and I got many exceptions. No output gets produced. When using the command line in the README file: 'fop -f

Re: proper fop command line

2007-10-26 Thread Andreas L Delmelle
On Oct 26, 2007, at 21:07, Khaled Aly wrote: Hi This command line: java -cp ... org.apache.fop.apps.Fop temporary.fo output.pdf will definitely not work with FOP 0.94, where it would have to be java -cp ... org.apache.fop.cli.Main temp.fo output.pdf I belive that FOP 1.1 should be used wi

proper fop command line

2007-10-26 Thread Khaled Aly
Hello all I've got a simple processing issue but I'm not involved in Java or processing in general . I'm trying to set a small batch file that includes a fop command line. I tried two versions of fop: 1. A version that is most likely fop-0.20.4, and the problem here is that it strips out FO ta