Hi
Thanks, it works
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Andreas Delmelle <
andreas.delme...@telenet.be> wrote:
> On 04 Feb 2011, at 21:55, Ashish Kulkarni wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> > I need to create a border against one row as shown in screen below, the
> sides dont need to be dotted, but solid
> >
> > Here
On 04 Feb 2011, at 21:55, Ashish Kulkarni wrote:
Hi
> I need to create a border against one row as shown in screen below, the sides
> dont need to be dotted, but solid
>
> Here is what i have
>
>
What about just using
?
Regards,
Andreas
---
--
Hi
I need to create a border against one row as shown in screen below, the
sides dont need to be dotted, but solid
Here is what i have
___
|
|
| Column1
It is done via the API. It is all automatic using a document management
system :)
mehdi houshmand wrote:
>
> How are you invoking FOP? Programmatically (via the API) or via the
> command line? Once you know that, finding the file would be simple.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mehdi
--
View this message i
How are you invoking FOP? Programmatically (via the API) or via the
command line? Once you know that, finding the file would be simple.
Thanks
Mehdi
On 4 February 2011 14:33, hirenshah wrote:
>
> Erm... sorry I don't know where to find that. I have just started looking at
> this issue and don'
Erm... sorry I don't know where to find that. I have just started looking at
this issue and don't have a clue where all the files are.
Jeremias Maerki-2 - I can't see it because I am using Nabble to see this
mailing list.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp3
Hi Hiren,
If you take a look at the fop website, it may answer a few of your
questions, here's a link to the quick start guide:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/quickstartguide.html
Mehdi
On 4 February 2011 14:29, Eric Douglas wrote:
> No
> Your input file.
> That would be the file ending in
No
Your input file.
That would be the file ending in .fo, or the .xml and .xsl.
-Original Message-
From: hirenshah [mailto:hiren.s...@rbs.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:22 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: Shading Issue
The fop.xconf?
Eric Douglas wrote:
The one you see in my "From" header: d...@jeremias-maerki.ch
On 04.02.2011 13:52:12 hirenshah wrote:
>
> The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file.
>
> What is your email address? I will send you the AFP :)
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, I can't reproduce yo
The fop.xconf?
Eric Douglas wrote:
>
> The xslfo file. It's the intermediate file. I was a bit confused when
> I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
> If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl
> and xml files.
> The fo file must exist to pro
The xslfo file. It's the intermediate file. I was a bit confused when
I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl
and xml files.
The fo file must exist to process FOP but it doesn't need to normally be
a physi
The FO is the standard input format used by FOP (FO Processor), if you
use XML and XSLT, could you convert the XML into FO with the XSLT and
post the resultant FO file.
Hopefully that makes sense.
Mehdi
On 4 February 2011 14:11, hirenshah wrote:
>
> What do you exactly mean by the FO?
>
>
> meh
What do you exactly mean by the FO?
mehdi houshmand wrote:
>
> Hi Hirenshah,
>
> If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll
> take a look as well.
>
> Mehdi
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844681.html
Sent from th
Hi Hirenshah,
If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll
take a look as well.
Mehdi
On 4 February 2011 12:52, hirenshah wrote:
>
> The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file.
>
> What is your email address? I will send you the AFP :)
>
>
>
> Jeremias
The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file.
What is your email address? I will send you the AFP :)
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
> and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
> by
Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
checked with Co
You can put as many NOPs as you like in any of fo:simple-page-master,
fo:page-sequence and fo:declarations. But only with the current FOP
Trunk which is available from our Subversion repository. See here for
details:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/download.html#source
You can also try a nightly
Thanks! Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>
> I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
> something on Wednesday.
>
> On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
>>
>> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where
It may not solve the issue since nop in fo:declaration will be outputted once
for document and nop in page sequence is for each page but within the BPG and
EPG. I guess the printer is expecting to see the NOP before page begins to get
additional information for the page. Is it possible to add mu
I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
something on Wednesday.
On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
>
> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the output
> looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
> http://old.nabble.com/file/
Just FYI, I've added the possibility to add NOP's in fo:declarations
(NOP appearing just after BDT) and fo:page-sequence (NOP appearing just
after BPG). Not exactly what you want, I know, but I thought I'd mention
it. Adding NOPs outside their respective containers will not be trivial,
I think.
O
We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the output
looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png
When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
shading is completely black making the text unreadab
22 matches
Mail list logo
