On 09.04.2008 02:32:32 Christopher R. Maden wrote:
1) FOP now complains about empty fo:table-cells. This is strictly
correct, I suppose, but annoying. More troubling, it fails with an
exception and a stack trace when it happens, rather than a simpler error
message.
If you want to feed FOP
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 09:39 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The thing with the stacktrace was a temporary measure as some exceptions
were swallowed due to suboptimal exception handling. This will be
improved with the next release as we add an processing feedback system
that allows more
On 09.04.2008 10:19:09 Christopher R. Maden wrote:
snip/
Confirmed. There is indeed a bug there. But keep in mind, it should be
keep-together.within-column=always! Thanks for the feedback!
Gotcha.
Actually, I have to correct myself. I just noticed that keep-together
does not apply to
On Wed, 2008-04-09 at 11:17 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Actually, I have to correct myself. I just noticed that keep-together
does not apply to fo:table.body:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl11/#fo_table-body
Wow... thanks for catching that. It’s working perfectly now.
I can’t explain or
1) FOP now complains about empty fo:table-cells. This is strictly
correct, I suppose, but annoying. More troubling, it fails with an
exception and a stack trace when it happens, rather than a simpler error
message.
2) Line-wrapping doesn’t seem to happen automatically in table cells:
Apr 8,
