RE: linefeed-treatment in cell problem
Andreas, Thanks for your reply.. Indeed putting keep-together.within-page=always on the fo:block for which I want to preserve the linefeed does the trick. Does not seem logical however...this behavior has been introduced in recent updates to the trunk (somewhere between jan 20 and yesterday morning). Attached is an FO: -First example block linefeed is preserved (outside table) -Second block, linefeed is not preserved (inside table) -third block, linefeed is preserved (inside table and using the suggestion from Andreas, adding the keep-together.within-page=always) Is this the correct behavior? Tx., Raphael -Original Message- From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2008 18:50 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem On Jan 25, 2008, at 16:38, Raphael Parree wrote: Hi With the current version from the trunk the linefeed-treatment preserve on a block in a table cell does not seem to work. The enclosed fo file illustrates this. There was a recent post about this, IIRC... Try substituting 'keep-together=always' with 'keep-together.within- page=always'. The explanation keep-together=always is semantically equivalent to keep-together.within-page=always, keep-together.within- column=always *and* keep-together.within-line=always I'm not sure whether it is compliant behavior that a keep.within-line overrules preserved linefeeds, but that is what happens right now. HTH! Cheers Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] linefeed-treatment.fo Description: Binary data - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem
Hi Raphael, Apart from Andreas’ question about whether keep-with-next.within-line should override linefeed-treatment or not (I’d say no), the behaviour looks correct to me. If you put a keep-together=always on the first block you will get the same result as for the second one. I don’t see what could have affected that in the commits from the 20th of January. However, I did commit a fix on the 9th, changing the inheritability of the keep-together property to true, as required by the XSL-FO spec. That’s probably what started to trigger such a behaviour. HTH, Vincent Raphael Parree a écrit : Andreas, Thanks for your reply.. Indeed putting keep-together.within-page=always on the fo:block for which I want to preserve the linefeed does the trick. Does not seem logical however...this behavior has been introduced in recent updates to the trunk (somewhere between jan 20 and yesterday morning). Attached is an FO: -First example block linefeed is preserved (outside table) -Second block, linefeed is not preserved (inside table) -third block, linefeed is preserved (inside table and using the suggestion from Andreas, adding the keep-together.within-page=always) Is this the correct behavior? Tx., Raphael -Original Message- From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2008 18:50 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem On Jan 25, 2008, at 16:38, Raphael Parree wrote: Hi With the current version from the trunk the linefeed-treatment preserve on a block in a table cell does not seem to work. The enclosed fo file illustrates this. There was a recent post about this, IIRC... Try substituting 'keep-together=always' with 'keep-together.within- page=always'. The explanation keep-together=always is semantically equivalent to keep-together.within-page=always, keep-together.within- column=always *and* keep-together.within-line=always I'm not sure whether it is compliant behavior that a keep.within-line overrules preserved linefeeds, but that is what happens right now. HTH! Cheers Andreas -- Vincent HennebertAnyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache FOP Committer FOP Development/Consulting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: linefeed-treatment in cell problem
Hi Vincent, Thanks for the response. In fact the linefeed was preserved until the update I made yesterday and it worked that way for many years now..,the last version for which I know for sure the linefeed was preserved was January 20. Ok I understand it is expected behavior. Thanks, Have a great weekend all, Raphael -Original Message- From: Vincent Hennebert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 26 January 2008 14:46 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem Hi Raphael, Apart from Andreas question about whether keep-with-next.within-line should override linefeed-treatment or not (Id say no), the behaviour looks correct to me. If you put a keep-together=always on the first block you will get the same result as for the second one. I dont see what could have affected that in the commits from the 20th of January. However, I did commit a fix on the 9th, changing the inheritability of the keep-together property to true, as required by the XSL-FO spec. Thats probably what started to trigger such a behaviour. HTH, Vincent Raphael Parree a écrit : Andreas, Thanks for your reply.. Indeed putting keep-together.within-page=always on the fo:block for which I want to preserve the linefeed does the trick. Does not seem logical however...this behavior has been introduced in recent updates to the trunk (somewhere between jan 20 and yesterday morning). Attached is an FO: -First example block linefeed is preserved (outside table) -Second block, linefeed is not preserved (inside table) -third block, linefeed is preserved (inside table and using the suggestion from Andreas, adding the keep-together.within-page=always) Is this the correct behavior? Tx., Raphael -Original Message- From: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2008 18:50 To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem On Jan 25, 2008, at 16:38, Raphael Parree wrote: Hi With the current version from the trunk the linefeed-treatment preserve on a block in a table cell does not seem to work. The enclosed fo file illustrates this. There was a recent post about this, IIRC... Try substituting 'keep-together=always' with 'keep-together.within- page=always'. The explanation keep-together=always is semantically equivalent to keep-together.within-page=always, keep-together.within- column=always *and* keep-together.within-line=always I'm not sure whether it is compliant behavior that a keep.within-line overrules preserved linefeeds, but that is what happens right now. HTH! Cheers Andreas -- Vincent HennebertAnyware Technologies http://people.apache.org/~vhennebert http://www.anyware-tech.com Apache FOP Committer FOP Development/Consulting - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: linefeed-treatment in cell problem
On Jan 25, 2008, at 16:38, Raphael Parree wrote: Hi With the current version from the trunk the linefeed-treatment preserve on a block in a table cell does not seem to work. The enclosed fo file illustrates this. There was a recent post about this, IIRC... Try substituting 'keep-together=always' with 'keep-together.within- page=always'. The explanation keep-together=always is semantically equivalent to keep-together.within-page=always, keep-together.within- column=always *and* keep-together.within-line=always I'm not sure whether it is compliant behavior that a keep.within-line overrules preserved linefeeds, but that is what happens right now. HTH! Cheers Andreas - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
