[foreman-dev] Ruby 2.2 and 2.5 support

2017-12-29 Thread Michael Moll
Ruby 2.5 added, as Ubuntu 18.04 is highly likely to bring Ruby 2.5 per default and the 1.18 release should support that. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [foreman-dev] slave02.rackspace.theforeman.org is down

2017-12-28 Thread Michael Moll
ed to run on that > particular slave. > > I am not familiar enough with our Rackspace slave's so if anyone else from > infra (Michael, Greg, Ewoud) gets a chance to look into its disappearance > it would be appreciated. That slave got reconnected again. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received

Re: [foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-12-22 Thread Michael Moll
, the remaining deprecation notices with Rails 5.1 should get > fixed and once this is done, Rails 5.2 is probably already released. The remaining deprecation warnings with 5.1 can be found in config/as_deprecation_whitelist.yaml Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because yo

Re: [foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-12-07 Thread Michael Moll
Hi, On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:52:24PM +0100, Michael Moll wrote: > > Would someone with more knowledge on the code side of the Rails 5 mind > > sending along an update of the path we see for getting to 5.1? > > We're currently blocked by two external dependencies: >

Re: [foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-12-01 Thread Michael Moll
ially I thought of one week having core using 5.0, but even now plugin authors can start working on opening PRs aginst plugins that will fix all the remaining 5.0 deprecations (breaking 4.2). Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group

Re: [foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-11-30 Thread Michael Moll
quire json 2+. > Is this a dependency that we can update alongside the Rails update? I found https://github.com/theforeman/foreman/pull/4869 Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-11-30 Thread Michael Moll
he RPM work can start. DEBs should just work fine without modifications. Plugin authors should check if anything is missing for Rails 5.1 and update, if needed. After that, the remaining deprecation notices with Rails 5.1 should get fixed and once this is done, Rails 5.2 is probably already released.

Re: [foreman-dev] speeding up tests

2017-11-07 Thread Michael Moll
s are much slower than unit tests, in general. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegrou

[foreman-dev] The road to Rails 5.1

2017-10-17 Thread Michael Moll
is that there's no Rails 5 compatible version of turbolinks-classic, so either Foreman needs to move to turbolinks 5 or a forked turbolinks-classic gem would be needed, if turbolinks should be kept. In the meanwhile Rails 5.1 should be packaged for RPM in some way... :) Regards -- Michael Moll -- You

Re: [foreman-dev] Vendorizing or Building RPMs

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Moll
?), and having consistent build processes makes it easier for > anyone to support users on different OSs. >From a user's perspective it's not that bad, but IMHO the current approach does have some downsides regarding plugins and I'm unsure if a big plugin like Katello can be handled by the curr

Re: [foreman-dev] Vendorizing or Building RPMs

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Moll
encies) I don't really have stakes in RPMs, but I'd try to stick with option 1 and I even expect that there's some demand for Rails SCLs at least in the RHEL/CentOS world by other projects, too. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &qu

Re: [foreman-dev] Proposed drop of supporting ruby 2.0 in hammer

2017-10-10 Thread Michael Moll
s been dropped in 1.16 and 1.17 will drop Jessie. > Focussing on 2.1+ or 2.2+ should be no problem. exactly. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

Re: [foreman-dev] Requesting discovery test for core PRs

2017-09-27 Thread Michael Moll
: > > * Bandwidth takes about 1/3rd of our $2k budget - perhaps we can affect > that Can we somehow see which part is taking most? I.e. is it the CI part or rather the website? Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &

Re: [foreman-dev] Access to foreman-infra

2017-09-25 Thread Michael Moll
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 02:01:57PM +0200, Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote: > To get more involved in foreman infra I'd like to request push access to > foreman-infra. At first I'd like to help more with the CI. +1 -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subs

[foreman-dev] Rails 5.0 used by default now

2017-09-13 Thread Michael Moll
ted at this moment, as RPMs still use Ruby 2.2 and DEBs are pinned to Rails 4.2 for compatibility reasons with currently released plugin versions. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe fr

Re: [foreman-dev] [Infra] Openshift V2 Sunsetting: Redmine and Prprocessor

2017-08-28 Thread Michael Moll
Hi, On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:55:02AM +0200, Daniel Lobato Garcia wrote: > Isn't theforeman.org also running on OpenShift v2? Nope, this is running on web02.rackspace.theforeman.org. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro

Re: [foreman-dev] [Infra] Service accounts and secret storage

2017-06-27 Thread Michael Moll
r we could host > the textfile somewhere (on the foreman.org?) I guess... In addition to pass, Ewoud already mentioned, I was recommended passbolt (https://www.passbolt.com) and gopass (https://www.justwatch.com/gopass), which is a rewrite of pass. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this messa

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Ruby 2.0 support in 1.16?

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Moll
requiring a huge amount of time (that we can't provide), so let's simply postpone the question of dropping Debian/jessie when it's time to desupport Ruby 2.1. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscr

Re: [foreman-dev] Dropping Ruby 2.0 support in 1.16?

2017-05-17 Thread Michael Moll
eman core. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [foreman-dev] Re: 1.15.0 release status

2017-05-10 Thread Michael Moll
r 1.15 (or whatever the approach is with these jobs in similar situations). Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to fore

Re: [foreman-dev] omnibus packaging

2017-04-20 Thread Michael Moll
AIO packaging was/is also a major downer for me. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@goo

Re: [foreman-dev] Moving foreman-tasks to the core: the plan

2017-01-04 Thread Michael Moll
-tasks code is merged into core. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to foreman-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com

Re: [foreman-dev] Removal of Ruby 1.8.7 in Puppet module tests

2016-10-18 Thread Michael Moll
'd propose for all theforeman modules to create x.y-stable branches with the current state (or some slightly earlier one, where required) and Ruby 1.8.7 tests enabled followed by a major version bump and dropping of EL6 support alltogether in master. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this m

Re: [foreman-dev] Deprecate EL6?

2016-07-29 Thread Michael Moll
EL6 support is really needed, somebody[tm] needs to do that work, but then we could also extend the lifespan not only some months, but probably some years. As I don't use RH based distro at the moment, I can't really say how widespread the use of EL6 for Foreman really is... Regards -- Michael M

Re: [foreman-dev] Revamping the news section of the website frontpage - design discussion

2016-07-01 Thread Michael Moll
e bottom is also clearly misplaced and taking too much space for few news. -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an emai

Re: [foreman-dev] Deprecate EL6?

2016-05-21 Thread Michael Moll
aller for 1.13, which should be a much smaller problem now, as the Puppet 4 / AIO changes did land in both. Regards -- Michael Moll -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails fro