Will you be using Load-Time Dynamic Linking for zlib?
If yes, will you be checking-in the import lib file too or leaving it to
the developer to provide it. If it's the later, then you will need to take
the path of the import lib file from the user as another argument to nmake.
This kind of makes th
On 17/06/15 11:47, Jan Nijtmans wrote:
>>Feature: On a few systems I want to have a dynamically linked
>> fossil.exe. I'm thinking "FOSSIL_DYNAMIC_LINK=1" (changes default ZLIB
>> to zdll.lib, /MT -> /MD, and link against DLL CRT).
>
> Well, I would expect this to be two different options: /M
On 17/06/15 11:56, Gaurav M. Bhandarkar wrote:
[---]
> If "not-to-build-zlib-all-the-time" is the feature wanted, can this be
> provided by things like incremental linking/compiling and not an extra
> compile time argument?
I don't see the problem; it's literally only adding
"FOSSIL_BUILD_ZLIB=
On 17/06/15 04:39, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
>>Bug: It seems like the build system wrongly assumes that if one is
>> building against zlib, one wants to build zlib. There should be a
>> FOSSIL_BUILD_ZLIB, just as there is a FOSSIL_BUILD_SSL.
>
> This is not a bug, per se. Since zlib is in the tr
Since this could affect me (a fossil user on windows) I'm commenting:
> There should be a FOSSIL_BUILD_ZLIB, just as there is a FOSSIL_BUILD_SSL
I assume ZLIB is a necessary dependency for compiling fossil while SSL is
optional. It makes sense not to ask if we want to build zlib or not at
compile
2015-06-17 2:29 GMT+02:00 Jan Danielsson :
>Feature: On a few systems I want to have a dynamically linked
> fossil.exe. I'm thinking "FOSSIL_DYNAMIC_LINK=1" (changes default ZLIB
> to zdll.lib, /MT -> /MD, and link against DLL CRT).
Well, I would expect this to be two different options: /MT v
Jan Danielsson wrote:
>
>Bug: It seems like the build system wrongly assumes that if one is
> building against zlib, one wants to build zlib. There should be a
> FOSSIL_BUILD_ZLIB, just as there is a FOSSIL_BUILD_SSL.
>
This is not a bug, per se. Since zlib is in the tree, I figured it was
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 6:29 PM, Jan Danielsson
wrote:
> Hey,
>
>In the very near future I'm going to make two changes to
> Makefile.msc, unless someone protests.
>
>Bug: It seems like the build system wrongly assumes that if one is
> building against zlib, one wants to build zlib. There
Hey,
In the very near future I'm going to make two changes to
Makefile.msc, unless someone protests.
Bug: It seems like the build system wrongly assumes that if one is
building against zlib, one wants to build zlib. There should be a
FOSSIL_BUILD_ZLIB, just as there is a FOSSIL_BUILD_SSL.
