Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-27 Thread Ross Berteig
On 9/27/2016 12:33 PM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said Ross Berteig on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:56:22 -0700: The branch may have been good before the merge from trunk, but it is a mess right now. It needs cleanup and likely merging from something closer to the tip of trunk. Indeed, at the t

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ross Berteig on Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:56:22 -0700: > The branch may have been good before the merge from trunk, but it is a > mess right now. It needs cleanup and likely merging from something > closer to the tip of trunk. Indeed, at the time I sent the email, it worked. It l

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-26 Thread Ross Berteig
On 9/24/2016 10:10 AM, Andy Bradford wrote: Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:32:13 -0700: stash-fixes -- FIX: Seems relatively straightforward? I think this one is pretty much ready, but if someone wants to take a look to make sure the SQL is right, that might

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-25 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 23/09/16 04:32, Joe Mistachkin wrote: [---] > jan-manifest-tags -- FEATURE: Fairly complex, has new tests. If there are no objections, I'll merge this to trunk at ~end of next week. -- Kind Regards, Jan ___ fossil-dev mailing list fossil-d

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-24 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 23/09/16 04:32, Joe Mistachkin wrote: > In my opinion, the following branches seem like they are ready for final > review and/or merging: [---] > jan-manifest-tags -- FEATURE: Fairly complex, has new tests. Yes, this should be ready for trunkification. -- Kind Regards, Jan __

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said "Joe Mistachkin" on Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:32:13 -0700: > stash-fixes -- FIX: Seems relatively straightforward? I think this one is pretty much ready, but if someone wants to take a look to make sure the SQL is right, that might be good. I believe it passes all the test cases.

Re: [fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-23 Thread Ross Berteig
On 9/22/2016 7:32 PM, Joe Mistachkin wrote: In my opinion, the following branches seem like they are ready for final review and/or merging: For the branches where it makes sense to do it, I'll build and test a variety of configurations targeting Win32 using GCC 4.7.2 via Msys bash and ./confi

[fossil-dev] Branches in need of review and/or merging (prior to the next release?)...

2016-09-22 Thread Joe Mistachkin
In my opinion, the following branches seem like they are ready for final review and/or merging: nick.lloyd-git-interop -- FIX: Needs a Git expert. stash-fixes -- FIX: Seems relatively straightforward? ff4a4fe6b2b1db43 -- FIX: Stub for !FOSSIL_HAVE_FUSEFS. Needed???