[fossil-users] Fossil integration in repositories dynamically managed

Hi all, I have to manage many (D)VCS and many repositories and I want to integrate fossil. I have many constraints and, for the moment, I have the following architecture: - A simple web interface which allow the creation and the deletion of repositories and the membre which are allowed to interac

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0100, James Turner wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:39:06PM +, David Given wrote: Richard Hipp wrote: [...] > CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I > agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I > f

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 03:39:06PM +, David Given wrote: > Richard Hipp wrote: > [...] > > CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I > > agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I > > fear to change it because that might cause problems for

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

Richard Hipp wrote: [...] > CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I > agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I > fear to change it because that might cause problems for existing scripts. Add a -p for physical option to actually change the

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

On Tue, 20 Nov, Richard Hipp wrote: > Some uses are less clear. For example, at > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/33d79f5b0a2?ln=850 we are > converting an entire command-line, which does likely contain some > filenames, but also might contain other text where *?"<>| are > legitimate ch

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 6:45 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:32 AM, j. van den hoff < > veedeeh...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> I already stumbled a couple of times over the fact that `fossil rm' and >> `fossil mv' only act >> on the repository but not on the check out, i.e

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012/11/20 Richard Hipp : > I think that there needs to be two separate versions of > fossil_utf8_to_unicode(), or perhaps a parameter on one function, so that > some strings can get the conversion of problematic characters to the unicode > private-use range, while others go unaltered. I guess you

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Jan Nijtmans wrote: > 2012/11/19 Stefan Bellon : > > I think this restriction > > > > * Does not contain any of these characters in the path: "\*[]?" > > > > is too arbitrary. If you try to create a file or directory in the > > Windows explorer and type e.g. a "

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 15:00:29 +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote: On Nov 20, 2012, at 14:45 , Richard Hipp wrote: CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I agree with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I fear to change it because that m

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Nov 20, 2012, at 14:45 , Richard Hipp wrote: > CVS did not couple the actions, and I copied CVS in this regard. I agree > with you now, that coupling them is the right thing to do. But I fear to > change it because that might cause problems for existing scripts. This calls for making it a s

Re: [fossil-users] filename contains illegal characters

2012/11/19 Stefan Bellon : > I think this restriction > > * Does not contain any of these characters in the path: "\*[]?" > > is too arbitrary. If you try to create a file or directory in the > Windows explorer and type e.g. a " then you get a bubble help with the > information that you must not

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

Works for me, thanks! On 11/20/2012 03:43 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Ron Aaron > wrote: > > Yes, I think that would be a good solution. > > > Ron, and everybody else, please try the code at > http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/26

Re: [fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:32 AM, j. van den hoff wrote: > I already stumbled a couple of times over the fact that `fossil rm' and > `fossil mv' only act > on the repository but not on the check out, i.e. I always have to issue > two commands > in order to actually remove a file from the (future of

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > Yes, I think that would be a good solution. > Ron, and everybody else, please try the code at http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/info/26ac392308 and let me know if that works better for you. > > On 11/20/2012 03:11 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > >

[fossil-users] why does `fossil rm' not do the "real" thing?

I already stumbled a couple of times over the fact that `fossil rm' and `fossil mv' only act on the repository but not on the check out, i.e. I always have to issue two commands in order to actually remove a file from the (future of) the project. obviously this is different from other VCSs bu

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:13:51 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff wrote: some more remarks from a new user: I've been trying out fossil only for the last two weeks or so. and coming from `mercurial' (and knowing `subversion' to some extent) I find th

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 07:28:30AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell > wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +, K wrote: > > > > > > This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid. > > > > > > There should now be (

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

Yes, I think that would be a good solution. On 11/20/2012 03:11 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > > Perhaps the new behavior only occurs for check-in comments and > tickets, and the older behavior continues for wiki pages? The code is > set up to support that kind of thing __

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Ron Aaron wrote: > It is an unexpected change from prior behavior. I am used to writing a > wiki page, putting things in [brackets] where I expect to make a page, and > then click on the links to create the page. Much nicer than being forced > to go to the wiki

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

It is an unexpected change from prior behavior. I am used to writing a wiki page, putting things in [brackets] where I expect to make a page, and then click on the links to create the page. Much nicer than being forced to go to the wiki creation page and typing in the name. Perhaps there's a mid

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

On Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:53:04 +0100, Themba Fletcher wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Themba Fletcher wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 22:49:22 +0100, Richard Hipp wrote: On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:30 PM, j. v. d. hoff wrote:

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +, K wrote: > > > > This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid. > > > > There should now be (I haven't found occasion to update my Fossil to 1.24 > > given I'd have to repa

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff >> mostly I would like to get information here whether there are changes >> (edits, adds, removals...) or not and what files are not tracked. >> `hg stat' does provide that. in fossil I have to d

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

Le 2012-11-20 à 04:58, Joan Picanyol i Puig a écrit : > * Richard Hipp [20121120 01:13]: >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff >> wrote: >> >>> -- fossil timeline: I find this really hard to read and use for at least >>> two reason

Re: [fossil-users] suggestion

* Richard Hipp [20121120 01:13]: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:12 PM, j. v. d. hoff > wrote: > > > -- fossil timeline: I find this really hard to read and use for at least > > two reasons: > > > > I seldom use "fossil timeline", preferring instead to

Re: [fossil-users] serious problem with wiki editing

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 06:20:02AM +, K wrote: > > This is as a result of a featured added on my behalf, I'm afraid. > > There should now be (I haven't found occasion to update my Fossil to 1.24 > given I'd have to repatch the wiki page name length requirement) an option > somewhere allowing

Re: [fossil-users] working checkout does not match what would have ended up in the repository

On Mon, 19 Nov, Richard Hipp wrote: > Fossil compresses files using zlib (and delta compression if other > similar files are available) and stores the result as an SQLite > BLOB. The maximum size of an SQLite BLOB is 1GiB. So, unless the > 4GiB file compresses well, it is not a candidate for bei