Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

2014-05-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Sun, 18 May 2014 21:34:10 +0200: I think it would result in the possibility (however unlikely) that a ticket change hook firing is missing. Scenario: Assume a sync is done containing 2 chunks, the sync of the second chunk fails for whatever reason. If the first

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

2014-05-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Sun, 18 May 2014 21:34:10 +0200: Is there anything else it should do? E.g. should the changes in the autosync-tries branch be merged with it to make autosync try multiple times to sync? Perhaps the need to have autosync try harder is minimized if Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

2014-05-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Sun, 18 May 2014 22:39:57 -0700: We are still seeing this scenario. User education seems to have lessened the frequency a little. Are you still running a version of Fossil that does not have this fix:

[fossil-users] Suggestions for autosync changes?

2014-05-17 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I've been using the code for the per-round-trip-commit and while it seems stable to me, I think it would be good for another pair of eyes to look at it: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vdiff?from=77f53423aec1d2ebto=4cfe13e962a95fe9sbs=1 I think it's ready to merge if folks are

Re: [fossil-users] Changing file name and creating old file name at same time causes potential problem

2014-05-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 14 May 2014 17:47:43 +0200: 'mv' (for reasons ido not understand) sets vfile.origname=vfile.pathname where vfile.origname IS NULL (that caused me a bit of greif in libfossil, as i have to work around it in several places). i

Re: [fossil-users] Excluding [brackets] from a.../a links

2014-05-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Wed, 14 May 2014 16:08:50 -0700: I have the same annoyance with scrape 'n paste. Would adding a space between the [ or ] and the hex string alleviate the annoyance but still provide the visual delineation? I think the problem isn't the amount of space between

Re: [fossil-users] Merging two leaves not on the same graph?

2014-05-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Wed, 14 May 2014 12:11:42 +0200: Anyway, I would like to execute the same plan (merge branch no-initial-commit to trunk) once more. If anyone thinks this is a bad idea (maybe because another bug prevents us to do that), I'm all ears. I did some

[fossil-users] WAL mode vs other modes?

2014-05-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I recently noticed that if I hit /stat on my own repositories it shows ``delete mode'' in the Database Stats, but on www.fossil-scm.org it shows ``wal mode.'' I assume this is to leverage some of the benefits listed here: https://www.sqlite.org/draft/wal.html I suppose it can

Re: [fossil-users] Changing file name and creating old file name at same time causes potential problem

2014-05-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Marty on Tue, 13 May 2014 16:34:29 -0700: Seems like there's a bug somewhere, but maybe there was an improper sequence of user events? Seems like a bug to me. Here is what I see: $ fossil merge trunk MERGE foo.txt RENAME foo.txt - foobar.txt fossil undo is available to undo

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil process hanging on sync to remote server?

2014-05-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Gerald Gutierrez on Sat, 10 May 2014 01:53:56 -0700: frame #8: 0x000105719ba2 fossil`ssl_receive(NotUsed=unavailable, pContent=unavailable, N=unavailable) + 50 at http_ssl.c:399 396 size_t got; 397 size_t total = 0; 398 while( N0 ){ - 399 got =

Re: [fossil-users] Trouble when making new repository

2014-05-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Fri, 09 May 2014 11:16:04 +0200: So it didn't even attempt to add the file that it said was ADDED. That's why the R-card is right. The error is the missing F-card. Please tell me that's not on the trunk? Yes, it was on trunk, and that's actually how I

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil process hanging on sync to remote server?

2014-05-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Gerald Gutierrez on Fri, 09 May 2014 15:40:13 -0700: $ ps auxww | grep fossil USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZRSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND xxx 7619 0.0 0.2 2490036 29836 ?? S 9:05AM 0:13.80 /usr/local/bin/fossil commit --no-warnings -m

Re: [fossil-users] Merging two leaves not on the same graph?

2014-05-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Thu, 08 May 2014 12:29:27 +0200: Well, I went ahead, and merged the proposed change to trunk. This means that the initial empty commit is no longer created by surprise, but it's only a change of the default behavior: When specifying

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Rich Neswold on Thu, 08 May 2014 15:18:43 -0500: I was thinking of attacking the problem a little higher up (since I'm way too nervous touching the low-level stuff): So did I initially, though my first thought was simply to have autosync try multiple times when failing (in the

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Doug Franklin on Thu, 08 May 2014 23:00:03 -0400: Does SQLite support nested transactions? If so, that would seem to be worth considering. It does appear to support them: https://www.sqlite.org/lang_transaction.html Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000536c46e4

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Rich Neswold on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:40:23 -0500: It would be nice if fossil would break the pull into smaller transactions which contain valid timeline commits so, if there's a database timeout, the next time I try to pull it can continue where it left off. I've been

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 07 May 2014 07:06:31 -0400: The purpose of the hooks is to verify that all of the content in the repository is still accessible. Before each commit, the hooks run to verify that all of the artifacts can still be un-deltaed and uncompressed and they

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 07 May 2014 11:02:55 -0400: We might be talking about different hooks. I'm concerned about the verify_before_commit hook implemented here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/artifact/615e25ed6?ln=94-104 Yes, it does appear that we were talking about

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 04 May 2014 22:44:21 -0600: What have I missed? Perhaps with the per round-trip commit it is not really necessary to also have a COMMIT if the network drops that is implemented in [1317331eed]? Ok, as it turns out, one potential resolution is to simply

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-04 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:33:59 -0400: Would that be a valid strategy? Couldn't we end up with a partial state which we can't work from until the pull finishes to completion? The logic (in manifest.c) is designed to be able to deal with partial state

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-05-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Danielsson on Fri, 02 May 2014 17:39:20 +0200: Artifacts sent: 0 received: 895 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM time_fudge WHERE mid=objid) WHERE objid IN (SELECT mid FROM time_fudge);} #key_3_2 [...] As you say, it is

Re: [fossil-users] please remove git import honours timezone from trunk

2014-05-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Thu, 01 May 2014 16:25:18 +0200: Maybe the idea is good, but the sign of the timezone correction was wrong, (Just a wild guess! ) I just tested and it's not the sign of the timezone. I created a simple git repository and then ran through fossil import

Re: [fossil-users] please remove git import honours timezone from trunk

2014-05-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said David Given on Thu, 01 May 2014 23:01:50 +0100: Are you sure that get merged? I remember asking for a sign-off a couple of times, but never got a response, and eventually abandoned it. It actually did get merged:

Re: [fossil-users] Commit User

2014-04-25 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Paulus Tuerah on Fri, 25 Apr 2014 06:12:31 -0700: I'm confused, I clone with user_b and push with user_b, how can the remote repository use user_a as the committer? The user that is used to do the sync operation may or may not be the same user that made the commit in the

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

2014-04-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:22:16 -0700: This has happened enough that I'm sure it was a real issue but it has been long enough since anyone reported it to me that I'd assumed it was fixed. Unfortunately, nobody has been able to reproduce so it's kind of hard to fix. The

Re: [fossil-users] strcpy() vs strlcpy()?

2014-04-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Eduardo Morras on Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:52 +0200: Don't know, but strlcpy() exists only in *BSD libc, but no in GNU/Linux glibc or Windows. Sure enough, guess I should RTFM a bit more. I looks like this isn't exactly an option then, and the strlcpy() that are used in

Re: [fossil-users] Name for inverse of annotate or blame

2014-04-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Wed, 23 Apr 2014 14:19:44 -0400: QUESTION: What do I call the hyperlink that shows annotate/blame only forwards in time instead of backwards in time. Could it be considered commit trail? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005358400e

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

2014-04-23 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Michai Ramakers on Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:34:32 +0200: I have no clue on sync logic at all, but perhaps this helps: in all cases I remember here (3 or so), when sync of commit on host A was not seen during sync on host B, doing a dummy-commit on host A, then pulling again on

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

2014-04-22 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Samuel Debionne on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:36:46 +0200: Here is a sequence I'm doing several times a day for years and that did not work this morning : fossil commit -m Blabla from my PC fossil update from my Mac Has a fork happened? Have a look at the timeline

[fossil-users] strcpy() vs strlcpy()?

2014-04-22 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, As of [2aaae64a59] compiling Fossil on OpenBSD results in a warning: bld/name.o(.text+0x11a): In function `test_ambiguous_cmd': ./src/name.c:742: warning: strcpy() is almost always misused, please use strlcpy() Is this something to be concerned about for Fossil? I know there are

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil update goes not get lastest checkin

2014-04-22 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 22 Apr 2014 18:07:08 +0200: Just to confirm that: this has come up several times before in the past year and, so far, has remained unexplained. We're not sure what causes it or how to reproduce it. (At least i don't remember seeing any commits/posts

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:01:28 -0700: Autosync: ssh://host/path/project.fossil Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM time_fudge WHERE mid=objid) WHERE objid IN (SELECT mid FROM

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:26:25 -0700: Yes! This is fixed on latest! Any idea which commit fixes the problem? Will you tell me exactly which version of fossil it is? e.g. run ``fossil version'' with the fossil binary that exhibits the problem on the server.

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-21 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Mon, 21 Apr 2014 09:26:25 -0700: Yes! This is fixed on latest! Any idea which commit fixes the problem? I ran fossil bisect to figure out where the fix came into trunk [I must say, this is the first time I've used fossil bisect and it was quite handy!]. Here is

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Thu, 17 Apr 2014 11:13:38 -0400: Would this really require a big change? Seems like about all you have to do is COMMIT after each round-trip to the server, rather than waiting to COMMIT at the very end. Or, just COMMIT instead of ROLLBACK after getting a

Re: [fossil-users] assert failure in http

2014-04-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Sat, 19 Apr 2014 16:38:44 -0500: $ fossil http GET /timeline Works for me: $ ../fossil http GET /timeline ... This page was generated in about 0.011s by Fossil version [53aea235fa] 2014-04-15 09:40:49 /div /body/html Also works for HTTP/1.1. I see we're using the

Re: [fossil-users] assert failure in http

2014-04-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Sat, 19 Apr 2014 17:12:04 -0500: Well, I do have $SSH_CONNECTION set due to having logged in via ssh. Yes, and ``fossil http'' reads that variable to determine what IP address the SSH client is coming from. Perhaps there is a better way or at least there might be

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-19 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Wed, 16 Apr 2014 09:01:28 -0700: fossil commit cfgdat tests -m Added another drc test Autosync: ssh://host/path/project.fossil Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:52:09 -0700: Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 109 Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 109 Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 773 Round-trips: 3 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 773

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:32:26 -0700: Could it be an OS dependency? I'm on SuSe Linux (SLES11). No, I can reproduce it on OpenBSD. I'm looking at it more closely to see what might be causing it. Basically, you need a long commit in progress and then try to sync. I can

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:41:39 -0700: How big is the repo? The one I'm cloning is 420 MB. Perhaps that is a factor? No, the problem appears to be the difference between using test-http and http as the remote command. The default behavior for the Fossil client is to send

Re: [fossil-users] can fossil try harder on sync failure?

2014-04-18 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 18 Apr 2014 18:56:09 -0600: Everything works as expected (e.g. no locking issues). I spoke too soon. If I give the Fossil user permissions (e.g. don't clone as nobody) then the issue arises again. It doesn't appear to be isolated to just SSH. I can cause

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion about fossil commit

2014-04-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said David Given on Mon, 14 Apr 2014 22:28:07 +0100: It might also be useful to add: # (To abort the commit, leave this file unchanged) I was about to point out that this wouldn't be a good idea when using merge --cherrypick because it actually automatically includes the

Re: [fossil-users] Suggestion about fossil commit

2014-04-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on Mon, 14 Apr 2014 21:40:00 -0600: ... but apparently Fossil is smart enough to figure out that even with an uncommented line in the commit message, it still treats it as an empty message unless you alter it! Correction, unchanged, not empty. Andy -- TAI64

Re: [fossil-users] default user confusion

2014-04-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Sun, 13 Apr 2014 17:54:49 +0200: question: would this need fixing? I think at the very least it should be possible to unset a user that was configured as a default via ``fossil user default user''; perhaps a ``fossil user undefault'' which executes: DELETE FROM

Re: [fossil-users] default user confusion

2014-04-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said j. van den hoff on Sun, 13 Apr 2014 18:37:56 +0200: only after your and stephan's responses I realize that `default-user' is _not_ initialized at the time of repo creation/opening but indeed only via `fossil user default somename'. It is correct that when you first clone, Fossil

Re: [fossil-users] fossil sync/pull/push --once broken as of [64aa75260f]

2014-04-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Thu, 10 Apr 2014 15:51:31 +0200: IIRC the original problem was that the user name was not being remember for normal use cases. That particular change has been in place since October with no problem reports except for this corner case (i didn't even

[fossil-users] fossil sync/pull/push --once broken as of [64aa75260f]

2014-04-09 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, It isn't possible to do fossil sync/pull/push --once anymore after cloning a repository if the Fossil user does not match the local user due to this change: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/64aa75260f48781c This is what happens... Here, the new URL is properly parsed

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Tue, 08 Apr 2014 16:58:00 +0200: AFAIR the point of collisions with Events has never been mentioned/pointed out before. i, for one, would be all for the UUID resolution treating events equally, _but_ that opens up potential new UUID ambiguities

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:33:10 -0500: Those look fine, but did you really intend to reject all requests for UUID abbreviations shorter than four characters? Yes, it was intentional. It was not my intention to change the length at which short UUIDs were supported, only to

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 07 Apr 2014 19:59:33 -0600: It's possible that one of these will collide with a ticket, ticket change or other blobs... Should these also be subject to the same test? By the way, in the event that there is a collision, the blob is preferred over

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 07 Apr 2014 22:43:21 -0500: I do prefer consistency, but we're going to need to think more about whether we want to break something which used to work just for the sake of consistency. I'm leaning more towards the thought that this didn't really work well

Re: [fossil-users] Authentication problems

2014-04-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kai Lauterbach on Sun, 06 Apr 2014 12:52:24 +0200: klaute@dev:AmbiControllerRemote$ fossil push http://klaute:password@pi:8193; Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 4 received: 0 Push finished with 5629 bytes sent, 606 bytes received This should have prompted you to remember the

Re: [fossil-users] Timeline graph problem on fossil-scm.org

2014-04-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Martin Gagnon on Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:55:58 -0400: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/timeline?y=ci The checkin from 2014-04-04 10:20 get a merge that look to come from nowhere. (I've tried to follow the line with n=2000) It looks normal to me. Specifically it looks like

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Thu, 03 Apr 2014 13:07:44 -0500: Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:37:35 -0500: When the UUID is abbreviated to one or two characters, the ambiguous artifact page is bypassed, and it always seems to link to a ticket.

Re: [fossil-users] Confusing highlighting in side-by-side ignore-whitespace diff

2014-04-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:06:30 +0200: Fixed here: www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c23190a61d Looks good! Thanks, Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000533d73db ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Confusing highlighting in side-by-side ignore-whitespace diff

2014-04-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 02 Apr 2014 18:05:24 -0500: The highlighting in most lines of this diff is confusing, and I don't think I can explain it fully. You'll just have to see for yourself. Indeed, there are numerous cases of something being highlighted as a change even though it's

Re: [fossil-users] Show entire file in diff UI

2014-04-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:52:04 -0500: For unified and side-by-side diffs, I'd like the option to show the entire file in addition to the current behavior of showing only a limited context surrounding the changes. Maybe I misunderstand your intention, but while

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:37:35 -0500: When the UUID is abbreviated to three characters, no artifact is found. When the UUID is abbreviated to one or two characters, the ambiguous artifact page is bypassed, and it always seems to link to a ticket. This explains part

Re: [fossil-users] Very short UUID abbreviations

2014-04-02 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Wed, 02 Apr 2014 21:37:35 -0500: When the UUID is abbreviated to one or two characters, the ambiguous artifact page is bypassed, and it always seems to link to a ticket. This explains why it always links to a ticket once you get to ``4e'' and just ``4'' for the UUID:

Re: [fossil-users] Long lines in tickets shift summary off page.

2014-03-31 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andreas Kupries on Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:48:16 -0700: That should be configurable in the HTML setup of the view page, i.e. repo/tktsetup_viewpage Generally look at repo/tktsetup Thanks, I'll take a look at these pages and see if I can get them to work out. Andy --

[fossil-users] Long lines in tickets shift summary off page.

2014-03-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Some of the tickets I submit have long lines in them, mainly due to base64 encoded data. In these tickets, the summary ends up far to the right of the browser and require scrolling to see. I don't mind the long lines in the comment, but is there any way to keep the summary in

[fossil-users] How to configure a server

2014-03-27 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Mallik Abhinas on Wed, 26 Mar 2014 16:25:17 -: And I want it to be changed to 80, I want my website to run in 80 port not on 8080. You should be able to get some ideas about how to set this up from the following: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/server.wiki

Re: [fossil-users] Files and directories in flat view

2014-03-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Goth on Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:14:58 -0500: At present, the only way to distinguish between files and directories in flat view is to check whether their link URL goes to dir or finfo. Will this work? http://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org/msg13816.html

Re: [fossil-users] Password not saved? Missing or incorrect password ...

2014-03-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Michael Weise on Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:03:20 +0100: Doesn't fossil store the password for future use? fossil version? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 4000532314e6 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] stashing of added files

2014-03-11 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 11 Mar 2014 10:32:23 -0400: I think I've seen this too. It might be a bug in fossil stash. It does appear to be so, however, I'm not certain what the best fix is. How about: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c2d748ae2c Or would it be better just to make

[fossil-users] http-auth branch?

2014-03-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, Is there any interest in testing and merging in the changes I made on the http-auth branch? It's fairly functional at the moment and as far as I know there are not any problems. The changes include: 1) Automatically prompt for HTTP Basic Auth when receiving a 401 in a

Re: [fossil-users] fossil/stunnel question

2014-03-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron Aaron on Thu, 06 Mar 2014 06:48:45 +0200: Does this mean something to someone? It's as though stunnel is trying to set a socket option on stdout or something... any help with this would be appreciated, I'm surely not the only person with this issue. Can you share your

Re: [fossil-users] fossil/stunnel question

2014-03-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron Aaron on Thu, 06 Mar 2014 16:54:41 +0200: The attached zip has the conf file as well as the log. The stunnel.conf that you sent worked just fine for me. I was able to successfully clone. At what point in your setup do you see the stunnel errors? What version of stunnel?

Re: [fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:08:00 +0100: Sorry, I respectfully disagree. Changing Listening to listening is a real change inside the string, indentation (sol-whitespace) and eol-whitespace (such as \r preceding \n) is generally considered irrelevant for

Re: [fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-05 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 22:52:04 +0100: Happy continued testing. I've been testing on the diff-eolws branch and it all looks and works very nice. Thanks for fixing the button that I introduced and didn't realize it didn't honor the Show Log button. Andy -- TAI64

Re: [fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-04 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 04 Mar 2014 09:20:28 +0100: That said, I would prefer too the default being NOT to ignore whitespace, that's what most other SCM's do. Except for annotations, then it is useful to ignore all whitespacing. Why is it useful to ignore all whitespace

Re: [fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-04 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Wed, 05 Mar 2014 07:38:05 +0100: All joel did was remove an if() around those lines, thereby changing the indent. Does that make joel the author? I think not! The diff-eolws branch gives the correct answer. Your addition gives the correct answer after

Re: [fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Joel Bruick on Mon, 03 Mar 2014 20:42:08 -0500: Thanks for all the enhancements, Jan. One thing I want to argue, though, is that diff --tk shouldn't ignore whitespace by default. I would further argue that the web UI also should not ignore whitespace by default. The first

[fossil-users] Missing highlighted space changes in diff?

2014-03-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I was perusing the recent commits and noticed that the web UI does not highlight (in red) the actual changes here: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/3df526ca41 On the other hand, fossil diff --tk does actually work correctly: fossil diff --tk --from 81162e791f --to 3df526ca41

Re: [fossil-users] Could --ignore CSG and ignore-glob be made non exclusive ?

2014-02-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Fri, 28 Feb 2014 11:54:02 +0100: i understand that i'm in the minority here, but i literally would not notice if addremove/clean were removed as features, and if the whole ignore glob stuff went away. Not that this matters, but I'm in the same camp---I

Re: [fossil-users] Painful team interaction with fossil, how to improve?

2014-02-13 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Mark Janssen on Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:06:49 +0100: * Email verification to prevent spam. MLMs (mailing list managers; like ezmlm, mailman, etc...) already solve this problem. Perhaps those who want notifications can subscribe to a tic...@domain.dom mailing list and the ticket hook

Re: [fossil-users] looking for interesting new fossil skins

2014-02-12 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Baptiste Daroussin on Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:40:37 +0100: I have also stolen long ago the google code like theme and has adapted it a bit: Is it intentional for all these ``google code'' look alikes to leave out a background color? Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400052fc4dbf

Re: [fossil-users] password manager support

2014-02-03 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron Wilson on Fri, 27 Dec 2013 16:30:43 -0500: I don't know how Fossil's SSH support works, but I'd be surprised if it doesn't support use of SSH-Agent. The nice thing about ssh-agent is that Fossil doesn't need to support it. As long as Fossil supports SSH, ssh-agent comes for

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-02-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kevin Martin on Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:14:20 +: How does fossil authenticate with a server, does it send the password plaintext? HTTP Basic Auth does! It's not encrypted, no, only base64 encoded. I'm not sure whether this should just happen by default unless the connection

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-02-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Matt Welland on Sat, 01 Feb 2014 08:52:56 -0700: In my opinion fossil should prompt the user for username/password as appropriate on receipt of a 401. If the channel is not ssl then a warning/are you sure would be a good idea. Would the username/password for this

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-02-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Andy Bradford on 01 Feb 2014 10:04:23 -0700: Thus said Kevin Martin on Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:14:20 +: How does fossil authenticate with a server, does it send the password plaintext? HTTP Basic Auth does! It's not encrypted, no, only base64 encoded. It seems I

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-02-01 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kevin Martin on Sat, 01 Feb 2014 09:14:20 +: I'm not sure whether this should just happen by default unless the connection is HTTPS as defaulting to sending plaintext auth data over HTTP seems like a bad idea. Agreed. It should not happen automatically when the data will

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-01-31 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Tal Yardeni on Wed, 29 Jan 2014 08:31:09 -0700: I think fossil should automatically detect the 401 and respond accordingly. This turned out to be much simpler than I initially thought... I have just committed a change that makes Fossil automatically resend the

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-01-30 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Ron Wilson on Thu, 30 Jan 2014 16:57:58 -0500: What part seems to be the problems? I'm not sure there is a problem, but there have been some suggestions/questions about how Fossil could handle disparate usernames (e.g. the HTTP Authenticated user is not the same

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-01-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kevin Martin on Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:50:05 +: I don't quite understand this, does it use basic authentication instead of fossil authentication? How does the fossil server process know which user you are? Currently Fossil inspects the REMOTE_USER environment variable

Re: [fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-01-29 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Kevin Martin on Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:50:05 +: I don't quite understand this, does it use basic authentication instead of fossil authentication? How does the fossil server process know which user you are? I realize that my last response to these questions was

Re: [fossil-users] fossil clone / sync / update with Basic Authentication

2014-01-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Tal Yardeni on Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:46:29 -0700: password for username: fossil: server says: 401 Authorization Required It seems that Basic HTTP Authorization is somewhat of a hidden feature. When it prompts you for your password, you must prepend # to the password to signal

[fossil-users] Command line option for HTTP Auth?

2014-01-28 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, I've just started a branch for exploring a different way to enable the use of HTTP Authorization headers in requests: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/e747041a72 Of course, removing the special character as a flag to enable HTTP Auth could potentially break some users who

Re: [fossil-users] gpg clearsign problem

2014-01-24 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said j. van den hoff on Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:25:38 +0100: I believe you, naturally. I'm only at a loss why, then, once upon a time I could branch without getting asked for the passphrase. also, I would expect that someone else would have run into this problem (clearsign off,

Re: [fossil-users] vdiff glob call for review/comments

2014-01-22 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Stephan Beal on Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:53:12 +0100: here's a call for review/suggestions for the vdiff-subdir branch, based on a suggestion by Michai Ramakers for a subdirectory-based filter for the /vdiff page, which then mutated into a more generic glob option. I gave

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-16 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:48:06 -0500: So we have a branch-1.28 which is suppose to be for release. I'm wondering if anybody is actually using and testing it? I've been using it since it was branched, although my limited use cannot come close to that of fossil-scm.org.

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:33:57 +0100: And the last one which doesn't affect fossil at all because fossil doesn't use fork(): https://www.mail-archive.com/sqlite-users@sqlite.org/msg81284.html Technically it does use fork() for SSH sync operations but I don't

Re: [fossil-users] How to re-open a closed leaf

2014-01-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Pierluigi Moschetti on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:01:18 +0100: I get the message: cannot commit against a closed leaf. Is there a way to re-open the leaf? I tried to edit the item in the timeline where Closed-leaf is shown, but I did not find any command to set the leaf to open

[fossil-users] Database locked, but which?

2014-01-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Hello, While attempting to pull the Fossil repository, I saw this error: $ fossil up Autosync: https://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 2 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Error: Database error: database is locked: {UPDATE event SET mtime=(SELECT m1 FROM time_fudge WHERE mid=objid) WHERE objid

Re: [fossil-users] Database locked, but which?

2014-01-14 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said B Harder on Tue, 14 Jan 2014 19:38:55 -0800: No pending commits in other windows? (ie: waiting for you to enter password for gpg key) ? No, and in fact, this was the first time I ran any fossil command after logging in and ps did not show any other fossil commands. I wonder if

Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.28 release?

2014-01-10 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Sergei Gavrikov on Fri, 10 Jan 2014 19:56:54 +0300: * Failures: ... th1-setting-5 th1-setting-6 These two failures appear to be happening because they expect to find a setting (autosync == 1), but find something else. I believe this is because they operate on the current

Re: [fossil-users] fossil cut first charracter of the filename

2014-01-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said shtine on Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:02:16 +0200: /kk1# fossil add ../opt1/one.txt filename contains illegal characters: /one.txt Perhaps the error is a bit misleading... Should it be possible to add files that are above the root of the open fossil repository? Main question for me is:

Re: [fossil-users] fossil cut first charracter of the filename

2014-01-08 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said shtine on Wed, 08 Jan 2014 17:02:16 +0200: if I change the name of the directory, I don't get error, but the name of file is transformed: /test1# fossil add ../opt1/one.txt ADDED ne.txt Both apparently are bugs. The problem is that all the checks for whether or not the file

Re: [fossil-users] tree-view of files

2014-01-06 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Joel Bruick on Mon, 06 Jan 2014 18:50:57 -0500: And... done. For added convenience, you can also expand/collapse every subdirectory at once by clicking the root directory. I wonder if it would be a good idea to change the class for tree-view directories from ``dir'' to ``treedir''

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >