On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:13:57AM +0200, Gour wrote:
> I'd like to export one repo from Fossil to Bazaar but it fails with:
>
> [gour@atmarama task.git] fossil export --git ../task.fossil| git
> fast-import fatal: mark :711 not declared
> fast-import: dumping crash report to .git/fast_import_cras
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:20:28PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> 1.5) If you happen to know of a *flat-rate* mobile internet provider in
> Germany, please let me know!
BILD.mobil might be the best option. They have pre-paid data cards for
around 7EUR / week, 1GB high speed. You might need someone i
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 07:11:17PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Joan Picanyol i Puig <
> lists-fos...@biaix.org> wrote:
>
> >< TCC +=-I../zlib-1.2.6 -g -O2 -DHAVE_AUTOCONFIG_H
> >---
> >> TCC = -cc -I../zlib-1.2.6 -DHAVE_AUTOCONF
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 12:44:24AM +0100, Jan Danielsson wrote:
>Joerg's NetBSD repository suddenly grew from ~2.5G to over 6GB.
Hm. Shouldn't have, the copy I have on disk is "just" 4GB. The majority
of the recent peak is due to some messed up RCS IDs triggering a chain
reaction from some ver
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:16:51PM +0100, Antoine Chavasse wrote:
> I have the same issue with one of my repo and I used bisect to
> pinpoint it to this commit:
>
> http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/bc8d368b66053450c7f323b4e479fb5b4a878684
>
> I don't know how the git export works though, so
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 03:52:02PM -0800, Andreas Kupries wrote:
> On 1/9/2012 12:16 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> >>I am wondering about fossil/git interaction. Everyone else seems to be
> >>using git an
On Sun, Jan 08, 2012 at 12:42:17PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> I am wondering about fossil/git interaction. Everyone else seems to be
> using git and github. I see that fossil can import from, and export to,
> git. If I understand it correctly, however, that is only for creating a new
> fossil or
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 01:36:43PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
> Regarding the use of ftp as a model for URLs - seems like a poor choice to
> me but whatever works is fine. I didn't find the /// in any of the rfc's
> for ftp - maybe it is a windowsism?
>
> Anyhow, passwordless ssh works fine for me
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 11:17:20AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
> sync via ssh
> =
> From my comments in another thread: I knew that ssh access did not work
> with fsecure but I just tested it and can't get it to work with openssh. If
> someone can confirm that using ssh as a transport mechan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:15:59PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> 2011/11/13 Lluís Batlle i Rossell
>
> > It should be quite tricky C code for a
> > C compiler to generate bad-aligned accesses for a given platform. I'd like
> > to
> > know where is that bad access; I've not checked, but I'd imagin
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 11:31:26AM +0200, Zeev Pekar wrote:
> 1) if I have 2 projects do I have to a) create 2 separate repositories
> or do I b) put both source trees in one repository? if a), how do I run
> fossil server to make both repositories accessible at the same time from
> outside?
Creat
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 06:42:21PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> The only problem with binary files is that you cannot merge them.
Even that is not necessarily true. You can't merge binary files like
text files -- sure. But it doesn't mean that for a specific binary
format, a merge algorithm isn't
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:59:00PM +1100, Christopher Vance wrote:
> To do this properly, you need to be aware that some operating systems
> (including OpenBSD, which I'm using) which do not allow IPv4 traffic
> on IPv6 sockets, therefore requiring separate sockets for IPv4 and
> IPv6. (Specificial
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:19:34PM +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:00:14 +0530
> ashish...@lostca.se (Ashish SHUKLA) wrote:
>
> [...]
> > 2. IPv6 support. Fossil uses IPv4 sockets by default. I was not sure
> > if there was any technical reason to not add support for IP
On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 05:13:35PM +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
> Might be best to also add in 'private'
>
> Cache-Control: private, no-cache
>
> for a more explicit description of the intent of only showing content to the
> user who requested it.
That's wrong. It should have a Vary header to re
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:22:28PM +0200, Paul Ruizendaal wrote:
> Doing fork/exec sounds expensive, but on a posix box there is not much
> difference between that and spawning a thread:
> http://bulk.fefe.de/scalable-networking.pdf
Please don't base decisions on questionable micro-benchmarks. for
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 10:25:28AM -0400, Jeff Slutter wrote:
> On 9/29/2011 2:12 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >What Operating System is that on? There might be a limit to the number
> >of filesystem objects that can be cached and your tree just large enough
> >to not fit i
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:31:19AM -0400, Jeff Slutter wrote:
> There seems to be a minimum time of 6 seconds for my operations of
> status, changes, and commit, and it would make sense that they all
> have to do the same work at some point (that would be 'finding out
> what files have changed')
W
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0800, i wrote:
> I don't want to use CGI, as it's already nginx running . so now I want to use
> nginx to set up the server for fossil and I don't know what to do.
> Thanks.
Either run fossil serve as standalone daemon or fossil http from inetd
and setup ngi
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 05:19:23PM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> > (and many, many, many, many more lines like that). This seems to be because
> > of the calls to asm() ... I don't know how to fix that. FYI, after
> > preprocessing, the first i
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 04:21:43PM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> When adding a "-std=c89" to the generated Makefile with gcc as the
> compiler, I end up getting (ignoring the C++ style comment at line
> 87)
That was part of
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/f2ede7da6d70851
I don't get that
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:53:45PM -0400, Martin S. Weber wrote:
> Sadly if you clone with http://USER@host/...my.fsl and enter the
> password in the prompt, it will *not* remember the password (at
> least last time I tried).
You can use USER:PASSWOR@host.
Joerg
__
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:43:56PM +0200, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
> My simple performance test of SHA-1 from checkin [f2ede7da6d] vs
> OpenSSL shows that the latter is a bit faster:
When I ported the NetBSD implementation, I was considering using
OpenSSL. The discussion with Richard was essentiall
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 08:06:57PM +0200, Michai Ramakers wrote:
> is it possible/easy to set what's displayed in 'Admin' -->
> 'Configuration' page (e.g. project-name and index-page) using the
> command-line interface? I would like to set this for a group of
> repositories/projects at once.
Not d
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 03:46:18PM +0800, Michael Richter wrote:
> On 13 August 2011 07:31, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_ as hidden on Windows,
> > that would be good too).
> >
>
> The ATTRIB command isn't wor
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:42:23PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> You know you can rename _FOSSIL_ as .fos, right?
>
> mv _FOSSIL_ .fos
>
> Should I make .fos the default?
I think .fos is too random / short. .fossil would be fine as default on
UNIX (if you can figure out how to mark _FOSSIL_
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:35:33PM -0400, Joshua Paine wrote:
> It's not hard to turn the new output into what you want, though. E.g.:
>
> fossil extras | grep -v '..'
You are missing an important thing here. "fossil extra" has to traverse
the directory tree, which can be a huge problem. I am tal
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:47:22AM +0100, Ben Summers wrote:
> * Versionable settings
OK.
> * SSL improvements
OK
> * Relative pathname listings
Not something I agree with. I think you want to implement the git
behavior? I find that utterly confusing and it doesn't add any real
value. From dea
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:03:03AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> So, I'm asking for volunteers for people with better autoconf-foo than me,
> to put together an autoconf/automake setup for Fossil. If you are good with
> autoconf/automake, please consider contributing your expertise to the
> project
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:09:52PM -0400, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> When use the "fossil sqlite3" shell, the arrow key doesn't work and I
> get something like ^[[A caracter appearing on screen when I try the
> arrow to access command history. (similar for and to move
> cursor)
It doesn't provide t
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:47:16PM +0200, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
> I also like nginx, but it does not CGI. (Right?)
I'm using nginx as reverse proxy, FYI.
Joerg
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:80
On Tue, Jun 07, 2011 at 11:48:18PM +0200, Paolo Bolzoni wrote:
>
> I am using fossil version [0448438c56] 2011-05-28 18:51:22 UTC
> and when I try to push one of my projects fossil hangs on the
> 'waiting for server' phase.
How fast is the connection? According to the output, it tries to write
al
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 01:23:38PM -0700, Zed A. Shaw wrote:
> > The current definition of "leaf" is a node that has no primary (non-merge)
> > children in the same branch.
>
> Definitions are pointless. I could define and define all day long and
> nobody would be able to *use* them. Translate t
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 07:57:16PM +0200, Felix Wolfheimer wrote:
> However, it took me a while to figure out that I need to copy all the
> dependencies (shared libraries) fossil depends on into the file
> structure accessed by the webserver.
make LDFLAGS=-static
Joerg
___
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:20:47AM +0200, Heinrich Huss wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was just wondering if this might be of interest for using with fossil:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/snappy/
Compression speed is practically irrelevant.
Decompression speed is IMO not that much of an issue.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 02:17:10PM -0400, Volodya Savastiouk wrote:
> The issue is the file dates being always today's date whenever one
> downloads a copy from the repository or simply opens a local copy.
This was discussed a while ago and I think the agreement was:
(1) Initial open may use the t
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 09:57:25AM -0600, Federico Ramallo wrote:
> Also, What we couldn't find out is how to delete a branch (or at least close
> it)
Use the web ui. You can mark a branch leaf as closed and you can also
move commits to different branches / change the tags etc.
Joerg
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 05:15:50AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Hi all,
> can someone try to reproduce the following issue?
>
> mkdir test
> fossil export > fossil.txt
> git init
> git fast-import --export-marks=marks.txt < fossil.txt
> while read num hash
Hi all,
can someone try to reproduce the following issue?
mkdir test
fossil export > fossil.txt
git init
git fast-import --export-marks=marks.txt < fossil.txt
while read num hash; do [ $((${num#:} % 2)) -eq 0 ] && echo $hash >>
commits.txt; done < marks.txt
sort -u commits.txt > commits.txt.s
g
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:06:46PM -0500, Ron Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 7:22 AM, Martin Gagnon wrote:
> > I've made you test... and after I push from first clone, it give no
> > error at all like
> > there's no conflict. But when I look at the main timeline (with fossil ui)
> > on cen
On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:41:23PM -0600, Federico Ramallo wrote:
> Actually I was thinking something like: john and mike work on project A and
> B, C and so on ...
>
> So far I created users on all projects.
>
> Can I share the user table?
You can just copy the entries of the user table, yes.
Hi all,
a few impressions from the first real use of bisect on the NetBSD tree:
(1) "fossil bisect vlist" needs a lot of time before starting to show
anything. I measure at least 5s for the cache hot case, if only a single
revision has been marked so far (near trunk leaf).
(2) It might be a good
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:09:42PM +0200, Ron Aaron wrote:
> My gripe is that if fossil already knows what is wrong, it should just
> do a rebuild without telling me I should do it...
I disagree, it can be very unwanted if you have a large repository.
E.g. it might require schedulung downtime or e
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:54:23PM -0500, Bill Whiting wrote:
> I just did fossil update $ID in order to build a particular version of
> the source and I find no manifest file in the checkout directory. The
> documentation on the website still talks about a manifest file, so has
> something cha
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Another reader suggested through a side-channel that I adapt the language
> here:
>
> http://oss.oracle.com/oca.pdf
I suggested it for two important reasons:
1) The original version from Sun is used as base by a number of legal
enti
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 01:08:40PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 1:06 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > > If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for
> &
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:25:11PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> If any reader has suggestions on a better way to do SSH access for Fossil,
> please speak up.
The correct way is to use ssh -T and a single instance on the other
side. This doesn't currently work since the HTTP processing is
fire-and-
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:51:59PM +1000, Steve Dalton wrote:
> I have some private repos that I remove the capabilities from
> anonymous and nobody user - I can do this in the UI - but any ideas
> how I do this on command line? I can't see anything in the doco... I
> can do something like "fossil
Hi all,
I've been experimenting with various big repositories and efficient
repository conversions. One of the somewhat surprising findings was that
adding the vendor branches for the NetBSD repository bumped the size
from 2.2GB to 3GB. I've attached an experimental patch to reduce it to the
origin
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 06:30:40PM +0100, Gour wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:38:30 +0100
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > I did write incremental export, but git is just too broken for that.
> > I still have the patches around somewhere.
>
> Do you mean that fast-e
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 10:03:15AM +0100, Gour wrote:
> Now I'm curious if someone has tried to use fossil for incremental
> fast-import/export?
I did write incremental export, but git is just too broken for that.
I still have the patches around somewhere.
Joerg
__
On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:45:42AM -0600, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> Am I missing something? Does the server need to use the same schema as
> the client? I figured they'd just exchange artifacts and let each handle
> the other's payload in whatever schema they had, but either that's not
> true or I'm m
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 02:23:06PM +0100, Dmitry Chestnykh wrote:
> On Jan 28, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> > Having empty text files "on platforms which do not support them" DOES
> > break the tree because the underlying files are now different (and
> > have different semantics) on
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:40:21PM -0600, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> I've used Fossil on various open source projects, and keep discovering
> that I need to permit the nobody user to clone these repositories--this,
> despite the fact that it has the checkout permission by default.
How recent is your f
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:40:15PM +0100, Benoit Mortgat wrote:
> However I would really appreciate if there was a way of synchronizing my two
> repositories as a native function.
fossil pull -R backup.fossil /path/to/orig.fossil
Joerg
___
fossil-users
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:15:32PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:32:22AM +0100, Kulcsár Ferenc wrote:
> >
> > > Any reason for not using one of the established web servers that
> > > actually implement the specs correctly? E.g. with ngin
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:32:22AM +0100, Kulcsár Ferenc wrote:
>
> > Any reason for not using one of the established web servers that
> > actually implement the specs correctly? E.g. with nginx you can either
> > hook up "fossil http" via inetd or directly proxying "fossil server".
>
> If I unde
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:22:51PM +0100, Kulcsár Ferenc wrote:
> I'm trying to get fossil setup on a Linux box with Bauk webserver.
Any reason for not using one of the established web servers that
actually implement the specs correctly? E.g. with nginx you can either
hook up "fossil http" via ine
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:22:51PM +0100, Kulcsár Ferenc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to get fossil setup on a Linux box with Bauk webserver. It's
> partly successful. I can point to my repo and administer it. The checkout
> is failing:
>
> $ fossil clone http://archlap.aneder.hu/fossil/proba1
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:29:59PM +0100, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> > My (very) favored option would be an option generate results as JSON, with
> > a well-specified grammar depending on the operation.
> >
>
> i would be more than happy to add
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:00:27PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> > > My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something
>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something
> like 20 developers and 2MLOC. Would I be crazy to recommend fossil? Thanks.
Can you translate that into number of files in a working copy and
average size?
Joerg
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:30:53AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Gour wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:44:25 -0500
> > >> "Richard" == Richard Hipp wrote:
> >
> > Richard> I'm wondering if I should make ".fos" the default instead of
> > Richard> "_FOSSIL_".
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:12:05AM +0100, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:06:47PM +0100, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> >> I was looking at
> >> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.ht
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:18:32AM +0100, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >> Using scrypt wouldn't increase size much as most of the pri
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:01:43AM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Using scrypt wouldn't increase size much as most of the primitives exist
> already. Using a format like $id$salt$encrypted like most UNIX systems
> for passwd would be an improvement in any case.
s/scrypt/HMAC-SH
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:06:47PM +0100, Laurens Van Houtven wrote:
> I was looking at
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/password.wiki and
> worried about the case of a compromised repository. Why does Fossil
> use SHA1 and not scrypt/bcrypt to store passwords?
Positive: the pa
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:33:17AM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Joshua Paine wrote:
>
> > On 12/22/2010 01:49 AM, Russ Paielli wrote:
> > > I keep getting this question when I open fossil:
> >
> > `fossil open` should be a relatively rarely used command. 'open' mea
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:28:26AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <
> jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > one of the smaller issues when comparing cvs and fossil is the handling
> > of mtime on check
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:18:52AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Michael Barrow wrote:
>
> > Slight correction: HFS+ if you created the filesystem w/o the
> > case-sensitivity option. the fact that case-insensitivity is the default
> > puzzles me, being a Unix pur
Hi all,
one of the smaller issues when comparing cvs and fossil is the handling
of mtime on checkout and update. If you checkout a new working copy with
CVS, all files will get the time of last commit as mtime. This is highly
useful as it makes it very easy to find out the age of a file when
browsi
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:22:42PM +0200, Trou Macacq wrote:
> About fossil server... on production (not ad hoc) this means using
> inetd daemon. And I might say something stupid, but I'm almost sure it
> not installed on my Ubuntu server 10.10 by default. And I trying to
> keep everything as stand
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 08:20:02AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Trou Macacq wrote:
>
> > 2) Should we consider using relative URLs instead of absolute?
> >
>
> That sounds like it is the right solution. But it is a big change. It will
> likely take a week or tw
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 08:33:29PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Having incomplete changes in the tree is bad for things like bisect.
> > It shouldn't be forced. The big issue here is that
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:55:27PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger <
> jo...@britannica.bec.de> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:09:58PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 05:14:08PM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski wrote:
> 1) work freely on my big change, committing atomic changes
> fl commit --private
> fl commit --private
> [...]
> fl commit --private
> 2) prepare to make a "real commit"
> fl up trunk
> fl merge private
> 3) make sure everyth
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 08:09:58PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Joshua Paine wrote:
>
> Scenario (2): You are in the middle of a big change when a minor bug report
> comes in. You stash your incomplete change, fix the minor bug, then pop
> your stash to continue
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 07:30:49PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger > wrote:
> > Consider it a merge conflict.
> >
>
> You mean refuse to do the merge?
Yes, at least automatically.
> Certainly a conflict warning will b
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 06:57:56PM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Suppose you have the "trunk" branch checked out and you have made changes to
> file xyz.txt locally, but have not checked them in. Then you do a merge of
> branch "other-branch":
>
> fossil merge other-branch
>
> The file xyz.t
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:15:55AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
> FWIW, I'm thinking I should rename the "import" command to "git-import" - in
> order to allow future expansion with other import schemes. Similarly,
> "export" should be renamed "git-export". Or, maybe there is a secondary
> command
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:06:45PM -0600, Nolan Darilek wrote:
> I have a project for which I'd like to use copyright assignment for all
> contributors. In thinking about it for a bit, I felt like Fossil might
> work well for this system. My thoughts were to make the contributor
> agreement a Wiki
201 - 281 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
