[fossil-users] Are commits with "a lot" of small files still an issue?

I have not experienced any problems like that myself, but when searching for online documentation for recursive unversioned insertion of files, id est I wanted to use the fossil unversioned add recursively without it telling me that paths with "./" like fossil unversioned add

Re: [fossil-users] Bug Report: Fossil 2.3 runs out of Memory During Check-in

> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:06:10 -0500 > From: Richard Hipp <d...@sqlite.org> > On 1/22/18, Martin Vahi <martin.v...@softf1.com> wrote: >> >> citation--start--- >> Fossil internal error: out of memory >> citation--en

[fossil-users] Bug Report: Fossil 2.3 runs out of Memory During Check-in

citation--start--- Fossil internal error: out of memory citation--end- It happened during the execution of the fossil ci Given that the Fossil had an opportunity to allocate at least 1GiB of RAM without running out of RAM, the issue must have something to do with

[fossil-users] How to Embed WebM Videos to Fossil Wiki Pages?

I know that the way to embed an image is by ![name of the link]() but it does not seem to work with the WebM videos. https://www.webmproject.org/ WebM is a video file format that all modern web browsers are able to play by default. WebM files can be inserted into web pages just like

Re: [fossil-users] Bug Report: Cloning with --private Fails

ate: 23 Oct 2017 19:27:08 -0600 > From: "Andy Bradford" <amb-fos...@bradfords.org> > To: "Martin Vahi" <martin.v...@softf1.com> > Cc: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Bug Report: Cloning with --private Fails > Message-ID: <201710

[fossil-users] Bug Report: Cloning with --private Fails

It doesn't even prompt for a password. Both, client side and server side, Fossil binaries are of version 2.3 ---citation--start- time nice -n18 fossil clone --unversioned --private --admin-user martin_vahi https://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/silktorrent.bash/

[fossil-users] Bug Report: Fossil 2.3 "make test" Fails: test pre-commit-warnings-fossil-1 FAILED!

Reproduction: Download and extract the https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/uv/fossil-src-2.3.tar.gz At the root of the source tree do with the GCC ./configure --prefix= --json --with-th1-docs --with-th1-hooks --disable-fusefs make # was/is successful

[fossil-users] Some VACUUM/REBUILD Related Feedback/Feature_Request

I'm not saying that it's necessarily a bug, but it would be nice if during the VACUUM'ing phase of the fossil rebuild a_huge.fossilrepository --vacuum --compress --cluster the Fossil Web GUI would say that the repository is currently being rebuilt in stead of saying

[fossil-users] Bug Report: Square Brackets Illegal at the WYSIWYG

Fossil version: 2.2 Reproduction: step_1) Open the WYSIWYG Wiki Editor and write: --citation--start--- range notation as known from math [1, ] --citation--end- step_2) Push the "Apply These Changes" button. step_3) Observe how the [1, ] has been

[fossil-users] Bug Report Update 2: Fossil Server side Corrupts if Client Process is Killed

After doing the fossil rebuild at the server side, central repository side, I get the following line at the client side: Fossil internal error: infinite loop in DELTA table citation--start COMMENTS.txt milestone_releases/currently_there_is_none.txt

[fossil-users] Bug Report Update 1: Failure to Recover when Previous Fossil Process got Killed

If I log into the web GUI of the remote Fossil repository and use the Admin -> Shunned -> Rebuild then the web GUI shows me: ---citation--start SQLITE_ERROR: no such table: ftsidx_segments Database Error no such table: ftsidx_segments: { DROP TABLE

[fossil-users] Bug Report: Failure to Recover when Previous Fossil Process got Killed

I do not know the exact operation that I killed by the key combination Ctrl-C, but the operation was probably one of the following: fossil addremove or fossil commit or fossil pull or fossil push The result is a "corrupted" repository file with a "locked SQLite" database file.

[fossil-users] Semi-Bug: File Browser in the web GUI is Relatively slow

Reproduction: 1) Open the link behind the "Home" menu option, the page page at https://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/mmmv_parasail_projects.bash/home 2) Select the "Wiki" menu option and observe that the site is "lightning fast", the new page is displayed practically the

Re: [fossil-users] Bug Report or a Feature Request: Cope with, Hosting Providers' Watchdogs

Thank You, everybody, for the kind and thorough answers. Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 18:15:56 -0400 From: Richard Hipp Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Bug Report or a Feature Request: Cope with Hosting Providers' Watchdogs >... > What operation is it trying to do that takes more than 10

[fossil-users] Bug Report or a Feature Request: Cope with Hosting Providers' Watchdogs

I'm not totally sure, what the issue in my case is, but I suspect that the issue might be that the hosting provider has some time-to-live limit for every operating system process that is started for serving a request and if the Fossil takes "too long" to process the request, then it gets killed

[fossil-users] Feature Request: Commit in Chunks to use less RAM

---console--session--excerpt--start SQLITE_NOMEM: failed to allocate 651456745 bytes of memory SQLITE_NOMEM: statement aborts at 22: [INSERT INTO blob(rcvid,size,uuid,content)VALUES(6,662828201,'9b81ec309fc0c2f2278f386c8b1917359fe24bd8',:data)] fossil: SQL error: out of

[fossil-users] Fossil Hosting by Generic PHP Hosting Services

Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2017 15:25:54 -0700 From: Richard Hipp > To: "Fossil SCM user's discussion" >... > wrote: >> Hey there, >> I currently know of two Fossil hosting systems, Flint and Hydra. > I'm going to take this in a different direction and

[fossil-users] Newbie Fossil Hosting and Culture

>... > Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:18:08 -0400 > From: Richard Hipp >... > Subject: [fossil-users] GitLab v. Fossil. Was: Eric Raymond (a.k.a. > ESR) haspublished an SCM > Message-ID: >

[fossil-users] Is Fossil Hash-collision proof?

I haven't encountered any collisions yet, but I was wondering, what will happen, if 2 different files that have the same size, same timestamps, different bitstreams, but the same hash (regardless of hash algorithm) were to be committed simultaneously, at the same commit? After all, it's the

[fossil-users] Fossil_v_2_0 Bug: Abandoning commit due to long lines in Foo

I unpakced the stblob that I tried to commit at the case that I described at my previous bug report and I tried to commit the batch of small files individually. No luck: ---citation--start

[fossil-users] Fossil_v_2_0 Bug: SQLITE_TOOBIG when Committing 1.6GiB size file

--citation--start- ./wiki_references/2017/software/2017_03_21_maidsafe_net_tar_gz/f59c44f4cfae80319685fc8abdbc374039c22b421141951ai_278e5c783e9d982543415b569b6095bde7f1e409077208c4bb6bc48ee3fefe3fh_0481949961s_1000v.stblob contains binary data. Use --no-warnings or the "binary-glob"

[fossil-users] Feature Request: Include file Names of wiki Page Attachments to the wiki Search Results

A test case is that I want attachments from http://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/silktorrent.bash/wiki?name=Attic+001+for+Holding+Various+Files to appear at my Fossil wiki search results. I'm not asking for the content of the PDF-files to be analyzed, only their file names. As

[fossil-users] Bug Candidate: wall Clock as a show Stopper at Cloning

I believe that this is a flaw/bug, because it is obvious that clocks of different computers can differ for various reasons. A value of a clock should not be a stopper at cloning a repository. If the difference between the clocks of 2 computers is also known, then one time is even convertible to

[fossil-users] Repo Checksum Speedup Idea: flaw in my comment

As it turns out, I already made a mistake at the tree based algorithm. The old, proposed, flawed version: > ... > array_of_nodes_with_wrong_x_node_hash=unique_by_node_ID( > clone( > ob_AVL_tree.array_of_nodes_that_had_changes_on_path_2_root >

[fossil-users] Repo Checksum Speedup Idea

> De : Joerg Sonnenberger > À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org > Envoyé le : Dimanche 4 décembre 2016 20h55 > Objet : Re: [fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source > ... > No. What repo checksum does is compute a separate checksum over

[fossil-users] Bug report addon: may be it's the push commad

I forgot to mention that I also push the commited files to a remote repository. The uplink is ~1MiB/s (~10Mbps) and the ping from my local machine to the remote machine is about 20ms So, even, if files were uploaded one by one, ~100k-files * 20ms = ~ 100 * 20 s = 2000s < 3600s = 1h So far it

[fossil-users] Bug report: Terrible Performance, when Checking in LLVM Source

Reproduction: 1) Download LLVM source. It might be done by executing the bash script from http://www.softf1.com/cgi-bin/tree1/technology/flaws/mmmv_parasail_projects.bash/artifact/3a28f1fb67a5d860 2) Commit the source. It is about 4.4GiB, over 100k files, over 6k folders, but it

[fossil-users] Announcement of a Fossil Usability Enhancement Wrapper Script

I suggest that You do not try it about a week, because I have not been able to extensively test it yet, neither is it anything very optimized and never will be, as a matter of fact, it's very inefficient, but it does have a practical feature set and might help other people in addition to me. It

[fossil-users] Nothing Serious, just what I've been, very Slowly, Working on

Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 08:27:04 -0700 From: Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> To: Fossil SCM user's discussion <fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org> Message-ID: <848f7448-5131-4606-ae05-503320a66...@etr-usa.com> > ... >On Feb 2, 2016, at 3:19 PM, Martin Vahi <martin.v..

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 97, Issue 2

> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 20:30:21 -0700 > From: Warren Young <w...@etr-usa.com> > ... > On Jan 31, 2016, at 5:17 PM, Martin Vahi <martin.v...@softf1.com> wrote: >> one of the particularities of the WebM format is >> that huge videos can be served from ordi

[fossil-users] Where is Fossil bugtrack?

At first glance it sounds like a dumb question, but I did not find a way, how to add my feature request to the https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/rptview?rn=1 I logged in as anonymous, but I still could not find a way, how to add my feature request. The feature request is that the Fossil