2012/10/17 Ron Wilson :
> On 10/17/12, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote:
>>> I'm sorry. It is burried in there. We were looking for it on the New
>>> Ticket page. Weird that all 6 of us would miss that.
>>
>> We use the ticket attachments
On 10/17/12, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote:
>> I'm sorry. It is burried in there. We were looking for it on the New
>> Ticket page. Weird that all 6 of us would miss that.
>
> We use the ticket attachments quite a lot. It works fine here
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 10:44:37AM -0400, Ron Wilson wrote:
> I'm sorry. It is burried in there. We were looking for it on the New
> Ticket page. Weird that all 6 of us would miss that.
We use the ticket attachments quite a lot. It works fine here, and it's enough
for our needs.
> On 10/16/12, Ri
I'm sorry. It is burried in there. We were looking for it on the New
Ticket page. Weird that all 6 of us would miss that.
On 10/16/12, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Ron Wilson wrote:
>
>> How much would it take to enabled add+commit a file via the web
>> interface?
>>
>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Ron Wilson wrote:
> How much would it take to enabled add+commit a file via the web interface?
>
> Specifically, as a means to attach files to tickets. We have
> unsophistocated users who are asking for the ability to submit tickets
> themselves rather than rely o
How much would it take to enabled add+commit a file via the web interface?
Specifically, as a means to attach files to tickets. We have
unsophistocated users who are asking for the ability to submit tickets
themselves rather than rely on us in SW development to enter tickets
on their behalf. This
6 matches
Mail list logo
