On 25 June 2010 21:37, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a
relatively simple encoder, it
On 26 June 2010 13:47, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 21:37, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
One of the reasons that I'm a
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.euwrote:
SCSU is not that useful for storage compression since fossil already
uses zlib and it has no other advantages I am aware of.
Deflate compression is only applied to commits. Deflate has
significant overhead, and is
On 26 June 2010 18:05, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
On 26 June 2010 13:47, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 21:37, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen
On 26 June 2010 20:59, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
Indeed, the loss is at the end in case of web pages, parts which are
missing in the middle are result of inserting different streams so
SCSU would not suffer more breakage than other encodings. Still there
is no apparent benefit
Sergey, now I use emacs and its mule-utf-8-unix encoding for commit buffer.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Sergey Sfeli sergey.sf...@gmail.comwrote:
Ruslan Popov wrote:
I've tried to use Fossil on russian version of Windows 7. I made commit
with
russian text in comment, when I run the
On 25 June 2010 12:15, Sergey Sfeli sergey.sf...@gmail.com wrote:
Ruslan Popov wrote:
I've tried to use Fossil on russian version of Windows 7. I made commit with
russian text in comment, when I run the UI and look at timeline, I saw that
russian text looks like squares.
Why don't just use
On 25 June 2010 21:34, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
Perhaps fossil should have a system encoding which it would get from
the environment (locales, windows codepage) and mark all commit
messages with it.
I vote that this is an extraordinarily bad idea.
Fossil is a *distributed*
On 25 June 2010 11:15, Sergey Sfeli sergey.sf...@gmail.com wrote:
Ruslan Popov wrote:
I've tried to use Fossil on russian version of Windows 7. I made commit with
russian text in comment, when I run the UI and look at timeline, I saw that
russian text looks like squares.
Why don't just
The trouble is that UTF-8 is a poor standard. It bloats many texts, is
quite expensive to parse, and has only one redeeming feature: It never
creates embedded nulls. I suppose that it shares its encoding with
ASCII is a feature too, but only a minor one.
Personally, I think that most systems
One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a
relatively simple encoder, it produces output which is comparable in
efficiency to that of most legacy encodings.
On 25 June 2010 18:53, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 18:09, Owen Shepherd
As an FYI I googled SCSU
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Compression_Scheme_for_Unicode
Owen Shepherd wrote:
One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a
relatively simple encoder, it produces output which is comparable in
efficiency to that of most legacy encodings.
On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a
relatively simple encoder, it produces output which is comparable in
efficiency to that of most legacy encodings.
SCSU is a horrendous encoding because it uses
On 25 June 2010 19:36, Michal Suchanek hramr...@centrum.cz wrote:
On 25 June 2010 20:18, Owen Shepherd owen.sheph...@e43.eu wrote:
One of the reasons that I'm a fan of SCSU is that, with even a
relatively simple encoder, it produces output which is comparable in
efficiency to that of most
14 matches
Mail list logo
