El 29/05/2013 06:28, "Jonathan Otsuka" escribió:
>
> Downloads are not compiled with --markdown (its still experimental) you
will need to checkout and compile fossil with --markdown yourself.
Beware that --mardown is not a configure option anymore, in trunk, so it
will be enabled by default in fu
Downloads are not compiled with --markdown (its still experimental) you will
need to checkout and compile fossil with --markdown yourself.
Jonathan Otsuka
On May 28, 2013, at 10:29 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> Do the default (downloadable) versions of Fossil not have Markdown support
> enabled
Do the default (downloadable) versions of Fossil not have Markdown
support enabled, or am I doing something wrong? My browser keeps
telling me "open or save this unknown file type".
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> If you forget to do it then, you can always visit a check-in after it is
> committed and click on the "Edit" link to do things like revise the check-in
> comment, update the check-in time, or move the check-in to a different
> branch (such as
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andreas Kupries
> wrote:
>> Do we have a "tips & tricks" page in the documentation ? That might be
>> a useful place, beyond the usual documentation of the fossil web pages
>> ... Although I have to admit, I
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Andreas Kupries
wrote:
> Do we have a "tips & tricks" page in the documentation ? That might be
> a useful place, beyond the usual documentation of the fossil web pages
> ... Although I have to admit, I do not remember seeing such general
> documentation regarding
On 28/05/2013, at 8:38 AM, Mark Janssen wrote:
> I did not know this, but find it very useful.
+1
Steve
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
>
>> A tangent: Note that when you "edit" a check-in, you are not really
>> changing the check-in. You are, instead, adding additional information.
>> Fossil does not erase or modify, it only augments. The original che
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 09:08:10AM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
> you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
> two nodes?
>
> I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not man
On 5/28/13 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
> you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
> two nodes?
I knew about it. When I read the first paragraph I was afraid you
were about to suggest remo
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Andreas Kupries
> wrote:
>>
>> ... Although I have to admit, I do not remember seeing such general
>> documentation regarding the web API (which pages, which CGI params)
>> either.
>
>
> It's relatively new:
>
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:55 PM, Andreas Kupries
wrote:
> ... Although I have to admit, I do not remember seeing such general
> documentation regarding the web API (which pages, which CGI params)
> either.
>
It's relatively new:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/help
and not all /page entries ha
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:08 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil, you
> can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those two
> nodes?
Yes, I do. I semi-remember it being mentioned quite some time ago here
on the lis
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
>>
>> My question about how this process with the "pending-review" branch works
>> was more about the mechanics of how you'd use such a branch to facilitate
>> code
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>>
>>
>> My question about how this process with the "pending-review" branch
>> works was more about the mechanics of how you'd use such a branch to
>> facilitate cod
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
> My question about how this process with the "pending-review" branch works
> was more about the mechanics of how you'd use such a branch to facilitate
> code review. What goes in that branch? How does it get there? What
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Fossil follows a BSD-style of code development, rather than a GPL-style.
>
I think my question may have been a bit ambiguous. I've pondered the
differences between those licenses a lot, and I very strongly prefer
permissive licenses.
(I've
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
> you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
> two nodes?
>
I did not know that.
> And assuming I'm guessing correctly, do you have any
Richard Hipp writes:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for
> Fossil, you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff
> between those two nodes?
It's new to me. Very useful.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-u
Yes, I noticed the changed formatting of the Timeline box and clicked it
and discovered the feature.
Some form of highlighting/flashing on hover or a tooltip is more explicit.
I like the cursor changing approach also.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Isaac Jurado wrote:
> For the particular case of the selective timeline diffs I guess it would
> help adding the following CSS to the commit nodes/boxes:
>
> cursor: pointer
>
> That way people would get a hint that the box is clickable.
>
Tnx. A one-line ch
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
>
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for
> Fossil, you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff
> between those two nodes?
>
> I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
> peo
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:08:10 +0200, Richard Hipp wrote:
Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
two nodes?
I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
people kno
Richard Hipp wrote:
[...]
> I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
> people know it exists. Please confirm or refute my guess.
I only found this out by asking whether such a feature existed, and
being told about it. It would never have occurred to me to try it myse
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
> you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
> two nodes?
>
> I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
> peop
On 2013-05-28 9:08, Richard Hipp wrote:
Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
two nodes?
I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
people know it exists. Plea
Survey: How many people know that in the web-based timeline for Fossil,
you can click on any two nodes in the graph and get a diff between those
two nodes?
I think this is a very useful feature. But I'm guessing that not many
people know it exists. Please confirm or refute my guess.
And assumi
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2013 12:39 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
> > There is a "pending review" branch (
> http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=pending-review&y=ci) on the
> Fossil self-hosting repository now!
>
> I'm not sure I
On May 28, 2013 12:39 PM, "Richard Hipp" wrote:
> There is a "pending review" branch (
http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/timeline?c=pending-review&y=ci) on the
Fossil self-hosting repository now!
I'm not sure I understand the workflow here. It seems the branch name
itself is "pending-review". Wher
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 6:10 AM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to know what sort of code review practices Fossil users employ. I
> believe this has come up at least twice: I've asked about it myself back in
> 2010, and Russ Paielli from the Scala team in 2011.
>
> A
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Laurens Van Houtven <_...@lvh.io> wrote:
> It is my understanding that Fossil doesn't come with such a tool for code
> reviews.
>
Correct.
> Additionally, the entire point of autosync by default is to prevent having
> to branch and merge all the time.
>
Not en
Hi,
I'd like to know what sort of code review practices Fossil users employ. I
believe this has come up at least twice: I've asked about it myself back in
2010, and Russ Paielli from the Scala team in 2011.
All the projects I currently work on have some explicit form of code
review, be it:
- Gi
32 matches
Mail list logo
