2013/11/26 Andy Bradford
amb-sendok-1388038260.iehncdlegomjloead...@bradfords.org:
First, if I hide a check-in and rename the branch to mistake, when I
view the mistake branch using /timeline?r=mistake those items do not
show up; of course this is certainly working as it should, but
On 26 November 2013 07:55, Joel Bruick j...@joelface.com wrote:
Michai Ramakers wrote:
is there a simple way to display repo file contents in a single
column, instead of 3, in the web UI? (or at least I see 3 columns
here)
Sorry for being way late to this, but you can get the
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote:
That works absolutely fine, thx!
Nonetheless, a one-column option is on my TODO list for over the Christmas
holidays. i'd like to see something more like conventional ls output
(with a few caveats/shortcomings due to
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 11:11:00PM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Mon, 25 Nov 2013 17:08:07 +0100:
Any objections to this change? At least it's not dangerous at all:
It's just as easy to unhide items than to hide them, just by
removing the hidden tag
Thus said Jan Nijtmans on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:50:52 +0100:
At this moment, only single nodes can be hidden, that's intended. I
see no problems making it propagating, it would make it easier to hide
big parts without anyone noticing. I'm not sure we want to encourage
that.
Tough choice.
Hiding clutter is hugely important in my opinion. If something is marked as
irrelevant then hide it regardless of how the final timeline looks. However
an obvious button to toggle show-all on the timeline would be equally
important.
I see the intent as enabling a view of the important and
Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:01:30 -0700:
Do you now have:
- a - c -
OR
- a c -
What about:
- a = c -
Where = is a new line style that indicates a hidden line of commits
between a and c?
Andy
--
TAI64 timestamp: 40005294f9ae
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.orgwrote:
Thus said Matt Welland on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:01:30 -0700:
Do you now have:
- a - c -
OR
- a c -
What about:
- a = c -
Where = is a new line style that indicates a hidden line of commits
b is not a fork, nor is it abandoned. think of it as math. The delta a-c is
equal to the sum of a-b and b-c. You can hide b and think in terms of a-c
just fine. The only complication is if other branches derive from b. but
that is up to the user to think carefully and mean what they say when they
Thus said Ron Wilson on Tue, 26 Nov 2013 15:17:31 -0500:
At the same time, I find it strange to hide commits whose content is
still being used (unless c is just a reversion of those changes, but
then I'd just commit against a, leaving b as an abandoned
fork/branch)
I too had the
10 matches
Mail list logo
