[fossil-users] disabled due to excessive bounces (again?)

Hi again, Ah I forgot something like this : "Your membership in the mailing list fossil-users has been disabled due to excessive bounces The last bounce received from you was dated 16-Oct-2016.  You will not get any more messages from this list until you re-enable your membership.  You will

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down? security issue ?

Security issue ?Ah yes, security is not the first target for Fossil. I was told by a security computer specialist that we should NEVER use xinetd, xinitd or something related...Of course, for the Fossil team, people I do know are not good enough ... :-D (One day I was wondering if downloading

Re: [fossil-users] Fossil on HN

Hi, 1/ "it is a do-ocracy"We didn't know that. NOW I DO KNOW ! Thank you.I don't think that the owner of a project will give the keys to the average people, do you ?However, the leader of any project knows who to listen to. 2/  "I’ve rebuilt Fossil several times over the past few days.  It

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

Using a rewrite in .htaccess on the home page will push everyone to https. Seems that the server should auto push to the https from http, but it does not. On my website I put the following at the top of the .htaccess file RewriteEngine On RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule ^(.*)$

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

FWIW, sqlite.org was also down (since it is on the same machine and uses the same xinetd process to respond to requests, but nobody bother to report that On 10/15/16, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 10/15/16, Johan Kuuse wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I cannot acces

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

On 10/15/16, Johan Kuuse wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot acces www.fossil-scm.org > Anyway, www.fossil-scm.org:8080 responds, so it seems to be a problem > with the web server. xinitd, which manages inbound connections on port 80, had crashed. I restarted it. Things should be working

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

Thus said Johan Kuuse on Sun, 16 Oct 2016 01:55:21 +0200: > I cannot acces www.fossil-scm.org Please try: https://www.fossil-scm.org/ Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 40005802d58e ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

I jsut tried it. Firefox reports an unable to connect error - Scott Doctor sc...@scottdoctor.com - On 10/15/2016 16:55, Johan Kuuse wrote: Hi, I cannot acces www.fossil-scm.org Anyway, www.fossil-scm.org:8080 responds, so it seems to be a problem with

[fossil-users] www.fossil-scm.org down?

Hi, I cannot acces www.fossil-scm.org Anyway, www.fossil-scm.org:8080 responds, so it seems to be a problem with the web server. BR, Johan ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

Hi, "They just add overhead to debugging build problems for no good reason" Not necessary an issue.Some people would like more verbosity, some others no verbosity.However, if you don't want those options, don't use them :-) In debian realms, those options are most of the time used and I agree

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 01:01:17PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > As I see output of "./configure --help" on autoconf/automake based code, > I see the following: > > --enable-silent-rules less verbose build output (undo: "make V=1") > --disable-silent-rules verbose build output (undo: "make

Re: [fossil-users] autosetup: hidden autoconf/automake compatibility

Hi, The good question is : Why don't they use autoconf/automake like most people do, at least CMake even if I don't agree with this ? Snobism ? :-P (LOL)   Best Regards K. De : Osamu Aoki À : fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org Envoyé le : Samedi 15 octobre 2016