[fossil-users] 'fossil open' and existing local 'manifest' and 'manifest.uuid' files

2018-08-07 Thread Artur Shepilko
By chance, just stumbled upon a curious issue: When executing 'fossil open' for a newly created repo, if there're any existing local files named "manifest" and "manifest.uuid" these get deleted. --- $ mkdir x $ cd x $ ls $ fossil new ../x.fossil $ touch manifest manifest.uuid $ ls

Re: [fossil-users] Who runs Fossil servers on Windows?

2018-08-07 Thread Eugene Mindrov
Richard, I'm running fossil as a server on my Windows laptop using approach #1: fossil.exe server --localhost --port 80 > If you are running a Fossil server on Windows, please share with me > how you set it up. You can respond via private email directly to me > if you like. > > (1) Run using

Re: [fossil-users] Who runs Fossil servers on Windows?

2018-08-07 Thread The Tick
On 8/7/2018 11:55 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: If you are running a Fossil server on Windows, please share with me how you set it up. You can respond via private email directly to me if you like. (1) Run using "fossil server" (2) Run using "fossil winsrv" (3) Using Apache with CGI (4)

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 11:02:03 -0400: > That would delay the second HTTP request coming over the SSH connection. When I suggested that, I didn't understand enough about the backoffice design---specifically that it was a long-running task. After reading the forum page you

Re: [fossil-users] Who runs Fossil servers on Windows?

2018-08-07 Thread Artur Shepilko
> (1) Run using "fossil server" Actually, it runs local to the PC, mainly to [self-]serve Wiki. Now looking at 'fossil help winsrv' it seems that this would be a better fit for such a use... Thanks :) ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread Gilles
On 07/08/2018 20:12, Stephan Beal wrote: That time frame is familiar to me, so i had to check... a couple timeline entries mention his use of libfossil, and late 2014 was when chronic RSI knocked me out of my hobby projects (which included libfossil). Too bad no one read, willing and able

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread Stephan Beal
On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 4:15 PM Donald Griggs wrote: > Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index "What you'll find > here is a work in progress " > > Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not > abandoned. The last code commit in the timeline was in late

Re: [fossil-users] Error during commit

2018-08-07 Thread Artur Shepilko
> My guess is that you are probably overflowing a 32-bit integer > someplace. If so, I fear that this will not be something easily > fixed. > Looks like it's the case at least in one place. There's int64 => unsigned int overflow at the call to blob_resize() (blob.c:865

[fossil-users] `set uv-syn on' only partly honoured (again)

2018-08-07 Thread joerg van den hoff
with current tip of trunk fossil set uv-sync on is not honoured by `clone', i.e. without explicit `clone -u', the uv files are not cloned. a subsequent `sync' (w/o the `-u'), however, does indeed initiate transfer of the uv-files from remote repo into the new clone. according to

[fossil-users] Who runs Fossil servers on Windows?

2018-08-07 Thread Richard Hipp
If you are running a Fossil server on Windows, please share with me how you set it up. You can respond via private email directly to me if you like. (1) Run using "fossil server" (2) Run using "fossil winsrv" (3) Using Apache with CGI (4) Using Apache with SCGI (5) Using Nginx

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 10:21:34 -0400: > yes, we do want backoffice to run for SSH transport. Then I suggest that we simply make backoffice_run() smart enough to know that it has already run once: For example, perhaps instead of a panic here, backoffice_run() should just

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread joerg van den hoff
On 07.08.18 16:16 , Andy Bradford wrote: > Thus said joerg van den hoff on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 16:10:15 +0200: > >> why did I see the problem only when actually cloning from another >> machine, whereas a clone using ssh while being loggedin to the server >> machine still worked? in both

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread Gilles
On 07/08/2018 16:14, Donald Griggs wrote: Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index     "What you'll find here is a work in progress  " Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not abandoned.  The last code commit in the timeline was in late 2014. It's a known

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Richard Hipp
On 8/7/18, Andy Bradford wrote: > Does it make sense to have backoffice_run() in the SSH transport? If > not, then your fix is apropos. yes, we do want backoffice to run for SSH transport. My "fix" is really a work-around, not a true fix. We need to devise a proper fix for this, but I

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said joerg van den hoff on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 16:10:15 +0200: > why did I see the problem only when actually cloning from another > machine, whereas a clone using ssh while being loggedin to the server > machine still worked? in both cases the ssh communication should be > the same,

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread Donald Griggs
Re: http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index "What you'll find here is a work in progress " Unfortunately, it appears the project is at least on hiatus, if not abandoned. The last code commit in the timeline was in late 2014. > > ___

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread joerg van den hoff
On 07.08.18 15:53 , Richard Hipp wrote: Please build the from the tip of the forum-v2 branch and let me know whether or not it is working for you. if the server machine is running that version, yes it does indeed. thanks a lot for looking into this issue ... I see from the checkin message

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Andy Bradford
Thus said Richard Hipp on Tue, 07 Aug 2018 09:53:35 -0400: > Please build the from the tip of the forum-v2 branch and let me know > whether or not it is working for you. I was just about to submit a similar fix but you beat me to it. The reason why this doesn't work the same as a

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread Gilles
Does it work? "What you'll find here is a work in progress to have a Tortoise-style tool for Fossil repositories. Currently there is no release just yet, there are no commands implemented as of right now, but file overlays are working great." http://www.tortoisefossil.org/index.cgi/index On

Re: [fossil-users] Why no EXE+DLL like SQLite?

2018-08-07 Thread sky5walk
Hmmm, that sounds like TortoiseFossil? I would deploy that if available. :) On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 9:42 PM, Gilles wrote: > On 07/08/2018 03:21, Ron W wrote: > > I never tried Sharp Fossil, but Fuel was a very clunky GUI. I think > non-programmers would be unwilling to put up with it. > > As a

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread Richard Hipp
Please build the from the tip of the forum-v2 branch and let me know whether or not it is working for you. On 8/7/18, joerg van den hoff wrote: > > > On 07.08.18 00:36, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 8/6/18, joerg van den hoff wrote: > >> question: the observation that it seemingly is related

Re: [fossil-users] The backoffice. Was: strange delay and messages during `fossil (uv) sync'

2018-08-07 Thread joerg van den hoff
On 07.08.18 00:36, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 8/6/18, joerg van den hoff wrote: >> question: the observation that it seemingly is related specifically to >> repos holding uv files is unimportant/irrelevant? or does that have >> implications where to look? > > This is not much help in debugging.